2016
DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2016.1196656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moditva in India: a threat to inclusive growth and democracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are reasons to see the current administration under Narendra Modi's leadership, with its strong neo-liberal, pro-business, growth-oriented, disparity-concealing (especially of disadvantaged Dalits, Adivasis, and Muslims) character, as keeping the economics of caste firmly out of policy view (see, for example, Tharamangalam 2016; Jaffrelot 2015). There has been cut-back of the various remedial protections, budget allocations, and programmes earlier extended to Scheduled Castes under the rubric of ‘inclusive growth’ in the Five-Year Plans of the national Planning Commission, which is now replaced by Modi's more technocratic ‘NITI Aayog’ 14 policy think-tank for his goal of market-driven ‘rapid transformation’ focusing on matters such as ‘developing infrastructure for the industrial corridors and markets’ (Engineer 2015).…”
Section: Invisibilizing Caste Economics: the Enclosure Of Caste In Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are reasons to see the current administration under Narendra Modi's leadership, with its strong neo-liberal, pro-business, growth-oriented, disparity-concealing (especially of disadvantaged Dalits, Adivasis, and Muslims) character, as keeping the economics of caste firmly out of policy view (see, for example, Tharamangalam 2016; Jaffrelot 2015). There has been cut-back of the various remedial protections, budget allocations, and programmes earlier extended to Scheduled Castes under the rubric of ‘inclusive growth’ in the Five-Year Plans of the national Planning Commission, which is now replaced by Modi's more technocratic ‘NITI Aayog’ 14 policy think-tank for his goal of market-driven ‘rapid transformation’ focusing on matters such as ‘developing infrastructure for the industrial corridors and markets’ (Engineer 2015).…”
Section: Invisibilizing Caste Economics: the Enclosure Of Caste In Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What appears to have set the 2017-2018 elections apart from earlier elections is the (selective) move away from development in the campaign (given that jobcreation and economic growth figures were not living up to expectations) to 'Moditva' (a word-play on Hindutva, or Hindu nationalism), in which development sits alongside a narrative of Hindu nationalism (Tharamalangam 2016). Regional variations remain: in some states of the North-East (some of which have large tribal and/or Christian populations) the BJP reiterated its development promise and pledged to use its control of the central government to that effect.…”
Section: Making Sense Of India's 2014 Election Results: the Assertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this neo-liberal vision of development, primarily along economic parameters is inherently conservative, disabling the Indian state from translating economic gains into sustainable human development (Tharamangalam 2016). While it brings women out in the public sites of capitalist production it simultaneously monitors and morally polices them through a discourse of protection (Purewal 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%