1994
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.460010404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human brain metabolic responses to familiarity during lexical decision

Abstract: Local cerebral glucose metabolic rate was measured using F18-DG/PET in 11 normal righthanded male volunteers performing two versions of a visual lexical decision task differing only with respect to whether the stimuli were all novel and shown only once, or whether they were all repeated many times. Each subject was also scanned in a resting state (eyes open and ears unplugged). Scalp recordings of cognitive evoked potentials in the same subjects and tasks confirmed that the effects of familiarity were present … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the lateralized effect is in keeping with results from functional neuroimaging experiments in which novelty related medial temporal lobe activity has typically been right lateralized (Nenov et al, 1994;Tulving et al, 1994; but see Dolan and Fletcher, 1997). The general trend of this finding has led to the suggestion that right medial temporal lobe plays a more salient role in novelty detection/processing than left medial temporal lobe (Martin, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In general, the lateralized effect is in keeping with results from functional neuroimaging experiments in which novelty related medial temporal lobe activity has typically been right lateralized (Nenov et al, 1994;Tulving et al, 1994; but see Dolan and Fletcher, 1997). The general trend of this finding has led to the suggestion that right medial temporal lobe plays a more salient role in novelty detection/processing than left medial temporal lobe (Martin, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Smoothness estimation for the pseudowords versus highfrequency words contrast for the x, y, and z axes: 8.7, 8.9, and 8.3 FWHM; search volume 1,295.7 resels. Madden et al, 1996;Nenov, Halgren, Mandelkern, & Smith, 1994) in which the processing of words and pseudowords could not be dissociated in the way it was done in the present work. In our study, the observed activation differences can be unequivocally attributed to the psycholinguistic manipulations of the stimulus material.…”
Section: Occipito-temporal Brain Regionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This argument was based on the finding that the MTL was significantly more active in response to new words (meaningful words that had not previously been presented during the experiment) than for old words (previously studied words). Noveltyrelated MTL activity has typically been lateralized to the right 66 MARTIN Nenov et al, 1994; but see Dolan and Fletcher, 1997, for greater left MTL activity for new versus old words). As we noted previously (Martin et al, 1997), novelty can be defined in several ways.…”
Section: Novelty Arousal and The Right Mtl: When (And Where) Nothinmentioning
confidence: 97%