2018
DOI: 10.1093/rb/rby002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human bone graft cytocompatibility with mesenchymal stromal cells is comparable after thermal sterilization and washing followed by γ-irradiation: an in vitro study

Abstract: Human bone allografts present a better alternative to autografts in terms of minimization of the harvesting procedure complications. Prior to the use in clinical applications, they require sterilization which aims to reduce bioburden. This often comes at the expense of their biological properties as carriers of cells. In this study, we evaluated the cytocompatibility of human bone allografts processed and sterilized by three different methods with mesenchymal stromal cells. Bone morphology, biological and bioc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, no differences in growth rate were observed among hMSCs. The present data are consistent with findings of Labutin et al, that thermal and γ-irradiated sterilization are favorable methods for promoting rat BMMSC survival on hDCB [26]. Furthermore, the present results for cell growth are concurrent with those of Heo et al, indicating no differences in proliferation potential of BMMSCs, ADMSCs, and UMSCs [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, no differences in growth rate were observed among hMSCs. The present data are consistent with findings of Labutin et al, that thermal and γ-irradiated sterilization are favorable methods for promoting rat BMMSC survival on hDCB [26]. Furthermore, the present results for cell growth are concurrent with those of Heo et al, indicating no differences in proliferation potential of BMMSCs, ADMSCs, and UMSCs [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…After removal of surrounding tissues, the distal femurs were cut into blocks (3 mm 3 ) with a medical hand saw. The wash and γ-irradiation procedures followed those of a previous study [26]. Briefly, bone blocks were washed in distilled water three times for 60 min at 60 • C. The first wash cycle was performed in 10% sodium hydrocarbonate for 20 min, 15 min in hydrodynamic flow, sonication with 10% sodium hydrocarbonate for 20 min at 60 • C, hydrodynamic flow for 15 min, 10% sodium hydrocarbonate for 15 min at 1850× g, centrifugation for 15 min at 1850× g. The second wash cycle was conducted following the same procedures as the first wash with distilled water rather than sodium hydrocarbonate.…”
Section: Processing Of Allogeneic Bonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Marburg Bone Bank system is based on the thermal disinfection of the femoral bone head and is considered safe, as the bone matrix in the graft provides the necessary osteoconductive properties required for successful bone repair [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. However, after being extensively processed, bone allografts lose their innate osteoinductive properties and, as a result, are unable to produce the same clinical outcomes as autologous bone grafts [ 12 , 13 ]. Therefore, there has been a growing interest in using growth factors and morphogens as substances that can provide osteoinductivity to bone substitutes [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after being extensively processed, bone allografts lose their innate osteoinductive properties and, as a result, are unable to produce the same clinical outcomes as autologous bone grafts. [12,13]. Therefore, there has been a growing interest in using growth factors and morphogens as substances that can provide osteoinductivity to bone substitutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%