2019 XXII Symposium on Image, Signal Processing and Artificial Vision (STSIVA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/stsiva.2019.8730249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Activity Recognition on Smartphones Using a Bidirectional LSTM Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downside is that they need big datasets to get reliable classification results, as well as more time to be trained and suitable stop criteria to avoid overfitting (and underfitting). For example, in [20,21] we can see this kind of models and with particularly good results. In fact, in [20] they implemented a modification of LSTMs which are called Bi-LSTMs (bidirectional LSTMs).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The downside is that they need big datasets to get reliable classification results, as well as more time to be trained and suitable stop criteria to avoid overfitting (and underfitting). For example, in [20,21] we can see this kind of models and with particularly good results. In fact, in [20] they implemented a modification of LSTMs which are called Bi-LSTMs (bidirectional LSTMs).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, in [20,21] we can see this kind of models and with particularly good results. In fact, in [20] they implemented a modification of LSTMs which are called Bi-LSTMs (bidirectional LSTMs). What makes this modification special is that these models can also learn from the future, throwing accuracies of around 95%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The categorized accuracy and other advanced metrics were considered to evaluate the sensor-based HAR of five LSTM-based DL architectures. A publicly available dataset of previous studies [ 25 , 31 , 36 , 45 , 54 ] was applied to compare the generality of DL algorithms with the 10-fold cross-validation technique.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Vanilla LSTM is proposed to overcome the HAR problem [ 43 ]. Later, different architecture-based LSTM networks were proposed to solve the HAR problem such as deep LSTM networks called stacked-LSTMs [ 29 ], hybrid LSTM networks called CNN-LSTM; combining the CNN with the LSTM [ 31 ], mixed LSTM networks called ConvLSTM [ 44 ], and bidirectional LSTM networks called Bidir-LSTM [ 28 , 45 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic time warping [23] 89.00 Handcrafted features + SVM [24] 89.00 Convolutional neural network [25] 90.89 Hidden Markov models [26] 91.76 PCA + SVM [27] 91.82 Stacked autoencoders + SVM [28] 92.16 Hierarchical continuous HMM [28] 93.18 Bidir-LSTM network [29] 93.79 A multi-layer parallel LSTM network [30] 94.34 Convolutional neural network [31] 94.79 Convolutional neural network [16] 95.31 Fully convolutional network [32] 96.32 Genetic algorithm to optimize feature vector [33] 96.38 Bidirectional LSTM network [34] 92.67 CNN [35] 94.00 Hierarchical deep learning model [36] 97.95 Our method (LDA + SVM)…”
Section: Recognition Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%