2012 IEEE 9th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS 2012) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/mass.2012.6708523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HTTP-CoAP cross protocol proxy: an implementation viewpoint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By extending QEST, Ponte [14], which is developed as part of the Eclipse IoT open source community [82], provides APIs to application developers that enable automatic conversion between REST, CoAP and MQTT protocols. Similar gateways exist in the literature providing a cross-protocol proxy, such as in [83] for HTTP-CoAP interoperability and in [70] for DPWS-REST interoperability. Other Eclipse IoT projects proposing IoT gateways are Kura [84], NeoSCADA [85], and SmartHome [86].…”
Section: Gateway-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By extending QEST, Ponte [14], which is developed as part of the Eclipse IoT open source community [82], provides APIs to application developers that enable automatic conversion between REST, CoAP and MQTT protocols. Similar gateways exist in the literature providing a cross-protocol proxy, such as in [83] for HTTP-CoAP interoperability and in [70] for DPWS-REST interoperability. Other Eclipse IoT projects proposing IoT gateways are Kura [84], NeoSCADA [85], and SmartHome [86].…”
Section: Gateway-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are many proposals addressing the challenges associated with semantic interoperability. However, it is important to distinguish between: (a) those proposals that implement semantic interoperability for just one specific IoT device [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], and (b) those that aim at implementing a semantically interoperable IoT ecosystem in which transparent mechanisms to interact with the IoT devices within are provided [8,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposals [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] -Guinard et al [29] Text Indexing Wei and Jin [30] Centralised Cassar et al [31] Centralised Gyrard and Serrano [8,34] Federation Zarko et al [35] Federation eWoT Decentralised…”
Section: Solves Sparql Querymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposal is directly related with the WoT Smart Gateway, but it is not limited to a REST-like interface. (Castellani et al, 2012) discuss about problems and solutions in mapping between HTTP and CoAP protocols regarding the implementation of a cross proxy between these protocols. This kind of proxy can transparently interconnect protocols maintaining most of semantics, but it has the drawbacks of being locked to only two and limited to very closer protocols.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%