1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(97)00071-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HPCE methods for the identification and quantitation of antibodies, their conjugates and complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The various DAR species of an ADC can potentially exhibit very different pharmacokinetic properties. ,,,, As such, the DAR and often the distribution are deemed as being critical quality attributes of an ADC. At the intact level, analyses of these species are often accomplished using separation techniques such as hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), ion exchange chromatography (IEC), reverse phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), or capillary isoelectric focusing. ,,, These approaches are coupled to absorbance-based detection techniques and are generally incompatible with mass spectrometry due to the high salt content required for analysis. RPLC can be interfaced with a mass spectrometer as a desalting technique to generate an infusion-like spectrum of the intact ADC sample, but separation of variants does not occur. ,− Recently, several studies have been published using native spray ion mobility spectroscopy (IMS) with MS detection for characterizing ADCs. With this approach, DAR and distribution can be determined from the mass spectrum and some resolution between DAR species is obtained during the IMS separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various DAR species of an ADC can potentially exhibit very different pharmacokinetic properties. ,,,, As such, the DAR and often the distribution are deemed as being critical quality attributes of an ADC. At the intact level, analyses of these species are often accomplished using separation techniques such as hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), ion exchange chromatography (IEC), reverse phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), or capillary isoelectric focusing. ,,, These approaches are coupled to absorbance-based detection techniques and are generally incompatible with mass spectrometry due to the high salt content required for analysis. RPLC can be interfaced with a mass spectrometer as a desalting technique to generate an infusion-like spectrum of the intact ADC sample, but separation of variants does not occur. ,− Recently, several studies have been published using native spray ion mobility spectroscopy (IMS) with MS detection for characterizing ADCs. With this approach, DAR and distribution can be determined from the mass spectrum and some resolution between DAR species is obtained during the IMS separation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of CE as analytical tool for recombinant proteins has been extensively reviewed [132][133][134][135][136]. One major application is the characterization of glycoprotein variants [137,138].…”
Section: Capillary Electrophoresismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reviews have provided information based upon the individual capillary electrophoresis (CE) techniques such as capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE, [6][7][8]), capillary isoelectric focusing (clEF, [9,10]), capillary electrophoresis using sodium dodecyl sulfate (CE-SDS, [11]) and micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC, also called micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography [MECC], [12]). Reviews have also been written for the analysis of recombinant proteins in general [13][14][15], antibodies [16], and glycoproteins [17,18].…”
Section: Capillary Electrophoresis Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krull et al [16] reviewed the existing literature on the CE methods for the identification and quantitation of antibodies, conjugates, and complexes. The authors described the analysis of antibodies using the major modes of CE and the major application of the respective modes, including clEF, MEKC, and CE-SDS.…”
Section: S-12mentioning
confidence: 99%