2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

hp Discontinuous Galerkin methods for advection dominated problems in shallow water flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
87
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the mass matrix is block diagonal, and for explicit computations, no linear solver is needed. We also observe a growing interest for the discontinuous Galerkin methods in coastal and estuarine modeling (Aizinger and Dawson 2002;Dawson and Aizinger 2005;Kubatko et al 2006;Aizinger and Dawson 2007;Bernard et al 2008a;Blaise et al 2010). For atmosphere modeling, the high-order capabilities of this scheme are really attractive (Nair et al 2005;Giraldo 2006), and the increasing use of DG follows the trend to replace spectral transform methods with local ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the mass matrix is block diagonal, and for explicit computations, no linear solver is needed. We also observe a growing interest for the discontinuous Galerkin methods in coastal and estuarine modeling (Aizinger and Dawson 2002;Dawson and Aizinger 2005;Kubatko et al 2006;Aizinger and Dawson 2007;Bernard et al 2008a;Blaise et al 2010). For atmosphere modeling, the high-order capabilities of this scheme are really attractive (Nair et al 2005;Giraldo 2006), and the increasing use of DG follows the trend to replace spectral transform methods with local ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate tidal flows in the Pentland Firth, we solve the shallow water equations using the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) version of ADCIRC [11,12]. This numerical scheme has been previously verified and validated for various applications such as modelling tidal flows and storm surges [13].…”
Section: Numerical Model (A) Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been only very recent (since 2000) that the DG method first appeared in geophysical fluid dynamics (GFD) applications. However, implementations of the DG method in GFD have remained primarily restricted to shallow water flow (see [44,35,2,20,10,12,37,40,34,23,24]). To date, there has been no published work on either SE or DG methods for nonhydrostatic mesoscale atmospheric applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%