2018
DOI: 10.1080/17543266.2018.1448461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How young consumers think about clothing fit?

Abstract: Perceptions of clothing fit from young consumer perspective were explored to develop an understanding of how they think about dimensions that influence clothing fit and how fit relates to psychological and social experience. The qualitative-dominant mixed methods design included focus group interviews and a survey. Participants were 66 female and male college students. In quantitative responses, respondents reported being slightly satisfied with clothing fit in general. Five qualitative themes emerged as impor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the semi‐structured interviews, participants evaluated garment fit through four key variables, namely, aesthetic fit, functional fit, physical fit, and social fit, a finding further corroborated by McKinney and Shin (2016), Shin and Damhorst (2018). The fit reviews that were chosen to feature on the experimental websites were based on the following criteria: The review had to encapsulate all fit parameters: Social fit, physical fit, aesthetic fit and functional fit (Shin & Damhorst, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the semi‐structured interviews, participants evaluated garment fit through four key variables, namely, aesthetic fit, functional fit, physical fit, and social fit, a finding further corroborated by McKinney and Shin (2016), Shin and Damhorst (2018). The fit reviews that were chosen to feature on the experimental websites were based on the following criteria: The review had to encapsulate all fit parameters: Social fit, physical fit, aesthetic fit and functional fit (Shin & Damhorst, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Adhering to prior methodologies, whilst wearing the dresses, participants were asked predetermined questions relating to garment fit to capture their first‐hand fit appraisal (Grogan et al, 2013; Rodrigues et al, 2017). Interview questions were taken from the clothing literature (Grogan et al, 2013; McKinney & Shin, 2016; Shin & Damhorst, 2018). This procedure facilitated the development of the verbal fit stimuli (UG fit review) for the web experiment (phase 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fabric properties such as bending, shear and friction are associated with garment fit (Pavlinic and Gersak, 2009). For instance, bending affects garment drape and it is associated with the aesthetic fit whereas fabric friction affects physiological comfort and it is associated with functional fit (Hunter and Fan, 2004; Shin and Damhorst, 2018). Silhouette, line and color components of a garment can be mimicked virtually; however, it is not easy to fully reflect fabric properties in a virtual context (Rodrigues et al , 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mirror neuron-rich areas, often implicated in mental imagery, may possibly predict the presence of purchase intention during product evaluation. Purchasing processes for apparel also involve both personal and social components ( Tiggemann and Lacey, 2009 ; Shin and Damhorst, 2018 ). Since consumers formulate fit satisfaction from both their own and others’ perspectives, the engagement of self-referential processing by the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) ( D’Argembeau et al, 2007 ) and mentalization by the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) ( Saxe and Kanwisher, 2003 ) and superior temporal sulcus (STS) ( Deen et al, 2015 ) may be essential in the consumer decision-making process of fashion products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%