2014
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-482612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How we evaluate and treat neutropenia in adults

Abstract: Isolated neutropenia is a common clinical problem seen by primary care physicians and hematologists. The evaluation of neutropenia is dictated by the acuity of the clinical presentation and the duration, age, and clinical status of the patient. In this review, we provide a practical approach to the evaluation of the adult patient with neutropenia, with the major focus on the evaluation of neutropenia in the outpatient setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
105
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Severe chronic primary neutropenia (CPN) in adults includes true idiopathic neutropenia (CIN), primary autoimmune neutropenia defined by the presence of neutrophil autoantibodies, and CPN associated with a T-cell clone (excluding large granular lymphocyte leukemia). [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] So far, there is no evidence based on clinical characteristics and outcome to consider these entities as different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Severe chronic primary neutropenia (CPN) in adults includes true idiopathic neutropenia (CIN), primary autoimmune neutropenia defined by the presence of neutrophil autoantibodies, and CPN associated with a T-cell clone (excluding large granular lymphocyte leukemia). [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] So far, there is no evidence based on clinical characteristics and outcome to consider these entities as different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A separate chapter includes the congenital neutropenia, that are hereditary blood diseases usually identified during the childhood and adolescence, typically of pediatric interest.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosis Of Neutropeniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other experimental groups of animals were given cyclophosphamide [16] in a triple intramuscular injection at a dose of 30 mg/kg in a saline on average 0.6 mL of 1% solution. At 6th, 7th, and 8th day of the experiment the animals of 1st-7th experimental group were injected intramuscularly with 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th groups, an average of 0.1 mL of 1% solution (5 mg/kg, saline), , , , , and , respectively, 6th, 0.1 mL of saline solution (placebo), and 7th, an average of 0.1 mL (5 mg/kg) of 1% solution of methyluracil [1,2] (the drug for comparison). Blood sampling was performed at 09.00 am from the orbital vein of rats in sterile hematologic tubes VF-052SDK with 2 mL of EDTA (K2) on 12th, 19th, 33rd, and 40th days of the experiment (1,7,21, and 28 days after injection of , -) under the mild anesthesia with ether.…”
Section: Peripheral Blood Hemogram Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), different kind of irradiation, and so on. At mild leukopenia pyrimidine derivatives like methyluracil (methacin) and pentoxylum, which convert in the body to methyluracil, are administered [1,2]. Both drugs stimulate the synthesis of nucleic acids, proteins, cell division, leukopoiesis, and tissue regeneration and are administered to patients with burns, fractures, and long-term healing wounds as well as to those who in need to increase specific and nonspecific immune resistance of the organism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%