How Voting and Consensus Created the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III)

Abstract

This paper examines how Task Force votes were central to the development of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III and DSM-III-R). Data were obtained through a literature review, investigation of DSM archival material housed at the American Psychiatric Association (APA), and interviews with key Task Force members of DSM-III and DSM-III-R. Such data indicate that Task Force votes played a central role in the making of DSM-III, from establishing diagnostic criteria and diagnostic definitions to settling questions about the inclusion or removal of diagnostic categories. The paper concludes that while the APA represented DSM-III, and the return to descriptive psychiatry it inaugurated, as a triumph of empirically based decision-making, the evidence presented here fails to support that view. Since the DSM is a cumulative project, and as DSM-III lives on through subsequent editions, this paper calls for a more socio-historically informed understanding of DSM's construction to be deployed in how the DSM is taught and implemented in training and clinical settings.

Relationship between sedentary behaviour and anxiety symptoms among youth in 24 low- and middle-income countries

“…Anxiety is among the main symptoms of mental disorders. Anxiety symptoms refer to a loss of interest in previously enjoyed activities, tiredness, restlessness, difficulty controlling worry and other symptoms [ 2 ]. Anxiety symptoms decrease the likeliness of finishing school, finding a job and enjoying a high quality of life [ 3 ].…”

Spasmophilia in the Cardiological Outpatient Department: A Retrospective Study of 228 Sub-saharan Africans over 5 Years

“…Panic attack was found in 2.19%. The symptoms of panic disorder according to the diagnostic criteria DSM-III [24] are, except a few, virtually identical with those of spasmophilia. In a group of 20 patients treated for panic disorder, Taborska found a concomitant incidence of latent tetany with known etiology and decreased levels of intracellular magnesium in 18 (90%) [25].…”

Diagnoser: Organisation, kultur og mennesker

“…I dag har dette paralleller til kritiske analyser af klassifikationssystemer som DSM IV og 5, og det er med til at relativisere og problematisere diagnoser som depression og ADHD. Flere forskere har givet eksempler på konstruktionen af sygdomskategorier, af diagnoser og på produktionen af diagnostisk evidens inden for medicin (Aronowitz 1998, 2001, Davies 2016. Også i kølvandet af teknologiske landvindinger, screeningsprogrammer, genetisk råd-givning med videre hvor landskabet aendrer sig for både patienter og sundhedsprofessionelle, får vi analyser af nye graenseflader for diagnostik, patienters og pårørendes udfordringer med at forstå og tilegne sig eller modulere en diagnose uden for eksempel at føle sig syg og eventuelt befinde sig ´at risk´ for noget, som allerede er en pre-diagnose i medicinsk forstand.…”