2016
DOI: 10.1177/1470593116652004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How users shape markets

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to elaborate conceptually on the user-market relationship. Existing research reports a limited user-market relationship, which simultaneously exaggerates and underplays user influence on markets. Assuming a constructivist market studies perspective, we argue that the scope of the user-market relationship is broader than developing offers and uses. We conceptualise market shaping as five inter-related sub-processes in which users may be involved as agents: qualifying goods, fashioni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, markets were viewed as entities that firms target, segment, and enter to maximize the profitability of customer relationships. However, recent literature acknowledges the importance of understanding the contexts in which non-firm actors contribute to creating and sustaining new markets (Humphreys, 2010), recognizes actors beyond the firm as influential in this process (Harrison & Kjellberg, 2016), and views markets as socially constructed phenomena (Nenonen, Storbacka &Windahl, 2019). Markets as value-creating systems are governed by various institutions which are shaped by the actors in the market (Vargo & Lusch, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, markets were viewed as entities that firms target, segment, and enter to maximize the profitability of customer relationships. However, recent literature acknowledges the importance of understanding the contexts in which non-firm actors contribute to creating and sustaining new markets (Humphreys, 2010), recognizes actors beyond the firm as influential in this process (Harrison & Kjellberg, 2016), and views markets as socially constructed phenomena (Nenonen, Storbacka &Windahl, 2019). Markets as value-creating systems are governed by various institutions which are shaped by the actors in the market (Vargo & Lusch, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these, which is affiliated with the stream of studies known as Consumer Culture Theory (CCT) (for details, see Casotti & Suarez, 2016), recognizes markets as dynamic systems and highlights the role of consumers in building and reconfiguring markets (Giesler & Fischer, 2017). The other one, which is known as Constructivist Market Studies (CMS), seeks to describe how actors with heterogeneous roles perform practices that constantly shape and reshape markets (Araujo et al, 2010;Harrison & Kjellberg, 2016). In common, the two perspectives recognize that different actors dynamically configure and reconfigure markets according to their hegemonic or alternative position, as detailed below.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much of this research has in the past concerned itself with financial markets, with the regulation of these, and with the performative role of economics, attention has now shifted to what is being referred to more as 'mundane markets' (Kjellberg & Helgesson, 2006). With this shift to 'mundane markets', the field of market studies has also become increasingly interested in consumers and their role in the making of markets (Harrison & Kjellberg, 2016;Kjellberg, 2008). Studies have, for example, explored both how market devices work in order to enrol consumers in the consumption of vintage goods (Brembeck & Sörum, 2017) and how consumers are qualified by advertising agencies (Ariztia, 2013), or they have discussed the issue of overconsumption (Kjellberg, 2008).…”
Section: Conceptualising Failures In the Agencing Of Consumersmentioning
confidence: 99%