2015
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How users employ various popular tags to annotate resources in social tagging: An empirical study

Abstract: This paper focuses on exploring the usage patterns and regularities of co‐employment of various popular tags and their relationships with the activeness of users and the interest level of resources in social tagging. A hypernetwork for social tagging is constructed in which a tagging action is expressed as a hyperedge and the user, resource, and tag are expressed as nodes. Quantitative measures for the constructed hypernetwork are defined, including the hyperdegree and its distribution, the excess average hype… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recruitment for depth interviews on social media Social tagging, a prominent feature of Web 2.0 technology, is an increasingly popular phenomenon for categorizing and describing content on social networks using usergenerated keywords in the form of hashtags (#) (Lin and Chen, 2012;Pan et al, 2016). Hashtags are a practical means to reach a large group of like-minded individuals and provide invaluable insights into the social interpretation, mental representation and knowledge structure of specific content (Fu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment for depth interviews on social media Social tagging, a prominent feature of Web 2.0 technology, is an increasingly popular phenomenon for categorizing and describing content on social networks using usergenerated keywords in the form of hashtags (#) (Lin and Chen, 2012;Pan et al, 2016). Hashtags are a practical means to reach a large group of like-minded individuals and provide invaluable insights into the social interpretation, mental representation and knowledge structure of specific content (Fu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In proposed social approach, learners are encouraged to provide and define the high-level context to interpret the data from sensed devices, so a simple way is needed to provide users to facilitate their participations. Social tagging provides users equal rights to freely assign arbitrary keywords (i.e., tags) to various resources, in which users, resources and tags are connected together by tagging or post actions (Pan, He, Zhu, & Fu, 2016). If we take the low-level context and the high-level context as resources and tags respectively, the tagging actions done by learners is just similar to generating new information (i.e.…”
Section: Concept Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al (2015) examined how image descriptions influence users' tagging behavior. Pan et al (2016) pointed out that usage patterns and regularities of tags with varying popularity were correlated to both user activity and resource interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robu et al (2009) used data from Del.icio.us to empirically examine the tag distributions over time and to study how coherent categorization schemes emerge from unsupervised tagging by individual users. Pan et al (2016) examined how users employ various popular tags to annotate resources in social tagging system. Klašnja-Milićević et al (2018) examined tag characteristics of learners in Protus in order to understand the personalities of learner tags and learner's tagging behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%