How two-tier boards can be more effective

Abstract

Purpose – This study seeks to explore how non-executive directors address governance problems on Dutch two-tier boards. Within this board model, challenges might be particularly difficult to address due to the formal separation of management boards' decision-management from supervisory boards' decision-control roles. Design/methodology/approach – Semi-structured interviews and a questionnaire among non-executive directors provide unique insights into three major challenges in the boardrooms of two-tier boards in The Netherlands. Findings – The study indicates that non-executive directors mainly experience challenges in three areas: the ability to ask management critical questions, information asymmetries between the management and supervisory boards and the management of the relationship between individual executive and non-executive directors. The qualitative in-depth analysis reveals the complexity of the contributing factors to problems in the boardroom and the range of process and social interventions non-executive directors use to address boardroom issues with management and the organization of the board. Practical implications – While policy makers have been largely occupied with the “right” board composition, the results highlight the importance of adequately addressing operational challenges in the boardroom. The results emphasize the importance of a better understanding of board processes and the need of non-executive directors to carefully manage relationships in and around the boardroom. Originality/value – Whereas most studies have focussed on regulatory initiatives to improve the functioning of boards (e.g. the independence of the board), this study explores how non-executive directors attempt to enhance the effectiveness of boards on which they serve.

Conflict in the boardroom: a participant observation study of supervisory board dynamics

“…This in turn stimulates an effective working relationship (Sundaramurthy and Lewis 2003). If relationships between executives and non-executives are tense, executives are less inclined to seek advice from their boards and more likely to regard their boards' control task with suspicion (Bezemer et al 2014b;Peij et al 2012). We therefore expect that a more established common framework among (supervisory) board members leads to less conflict between the supervisory board and the executive(s) and, as such, improves board task performance.…”

“…The lion's share of the board process studies rely on indirect access to boards through surveys (Bezemer et al 2014b;Calabrò and Mussolino 2013;Minichilli et al 2012;Zattoni et al 2012), documents such as board-meeting minutes (Schwartz-Ziv and Weisbach 2013), and legally prescribed disclosure forms (Agrawal and Chen 2011). This research is valuable but necessarily limited at the same time.…”

“…All the cases we investigated have a twotier governance structure. With a separate non-executive supervisory board it is more challenging, and thus more important, to resolve disagreements between the executive and non-executive directors (Bezemer et al 2014b;Peij et al 2012).…”

Who’s in charge, in whose interest? The experience of ownership and accountability in the charity sector

“…Such structures are meant to enhance the "control" role of boards and protect against capture, though such Who's in charge? BAM2019 outside directors can be neutralised through executives' manipulation of information flows (Bezemer, Peij, de Kruijs, & Maassen, 2014).…”

Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed companies

“…In practice, the majority listed companies in Vietnam are governed by two boards, namely Board of Directors (board) and Supervisory Board. Basically, Supervisory Board has the responsibility to monitor the board's activities (Bezemer, Peij, de Kruijs, & Maassen, 2014;Nietsch, 2005). The research will focus on the relationship between the characteristics of Supervisory Board, including such as the size and the independence of Supervisory Board, and firm performance.…”