2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0427-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How transit scaling shapes cities

Abstract: Transit accessibility to jobs (the ease of reaching work opportunities with public transport) affects both residential location and commute mode choice, resulting in gradations of residential land use intensity and transit (public transport) patronage. We propose a scaling model explaining much of the variation in transit use (transit commuters per km 2) and residential land use intensity with transit accessibility. We find locations with high transit accessibility consistently have more riders and higher resi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the implementation of e-monitoring is likely to have unintended consequences on the use of mass transit and, in turn, may lead to an unintended, though likely, increase in personal car use and, by extension, carbon emissions [41,42]. Reductions in mass transit usage may also lead to detrimental effects on health [43] and on residential land use [44]. Hence, governments and transit authorities wishing to employ digital epidemiology should think about alleviating the concerns riders may have regarding such approaches by adopting appropriate policies and, in tandem, incorporating strong educational campaigns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the implementation of e-monitoring is likely to have unintended consequences on the use of mass transit and, in turn, may lead to an unintended, though likely, increase in personal car use and, by extension, carbon emissions [41,42]. Reductions in mass transit usage may also lead to detrimental effects on health [43] and on residential land use [44]. Hence, governments and transit authorities wishing to employ digital epidemiology should think about alleviating the concerns riders may have regarding such approaches by adopting appropriate policies and, in tandem, incorporating strong educational campaigns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential absorbs all characteristics of a suburb, which indicate to what extent people are statistically attracted to it -this potential hence affects the aggregate relocation flows. These characteristics may include the distance to the centers of business or retail activity 37,38 , the public transport accessibility 39 , the quality of local infrastructure (schools and other local services) 36,40 , the housing affordability 37,41 , and perhaps, other publicly known but not explicitly defined subjective factors. Our model treats the attractiveness as a revealed quantitative characteristic of a suburb, inferring it from data, rather than being based on a particular subjective characterization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively measure the proportionality between population and the level of access to jobs, we group cities by country and fit scaling models 59 (Eq. (4)) to cities of the same countries.…”
Section: Scaling Access To Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%