How to put the real world into a 3D aircraft display

Alm, Torbjörn

doi:10.1049/cp:20010466

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At present, there have been some 3D design methods of the cockpit [5]. However, designers have to cost much to construct model and test it, and the users need lots of time to learn the using method and adjust themselves to it.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Aircraft Instrument Rapid Construction

Wanyan

Zhuang

et al. 2013

2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to evaluate the humanity design of instrument interfaces of different aircraft types, a rapid model construction technology is presented for this ergonomic experiment. To achieve the reusability, components are separated into entities that are classified by their behaviors. GL Studio is a good tool for creating a primary flight display (PFD) based on rapid construction. In addition, a dynamic response method of flight operations is embedded into the system. It records the reaction time and accuracy rate of subjects that are usually used to objectively evaluate the identification performance of instrument information.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Aircraft Instrument Rapid Construction

Wanyan

Zhuang

et al. 2013

2013 5th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This scaling problem together with more abstract object design (e.g., for surrounding aircraft) and a limited number of natural cues makes the judgment of distances, altitudes, sizes, etc. much more difficult for the operator (Alm, 2001). However, when it comes to certain tasks, like a landing procedure with superposed glide path information, there seems to be very little impact of display size and FOV (Comstock, Glaab, Prinzel, & Elliot, 2001).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptual Aspects of Symbol Shapes and Relations in 3D Aircraft Displays

Andersson

2002

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report presents two experiments in the area of perspective aircraft displays. The focus was to understand symbolic and symbol relations in the 3D environment. In the first experiment, subjects' ability to distinguish five different aircraft symbol shapes was investigated together with the perception of their heading in the 3D space. The perspective used in this experiment was egocentric. The second experiment investigated the judgment of the spatial relation between an own-ship symbol and a target symbol. Thus, in this case the perspective was exocentric and two aspect angles were used for the camera position. Both experiments were carried out in non-dynamic scenarios. The display character was topographic with a superposed grid on the ground surface. The overall conclusion from the experiments is that judgments of azimuth and elevation are very difficult in these static scenarios. Also, symbol recognition of 3D pictorial symbols is problematic for complicated symbol shapes, depending on different appearances for various symbol headings in the 3D space.

show abstract

Perception aspects on perspective aircraft displays

Andersson

Alm

2003

Displays

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How to put the real world into a 3D aircraft display

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Research on the Aircraft Instrument Rapid Construction

Research on the Aircraft Instrument Rapid Construction

Perceptual Aspects of Symbol Shapes and Relations in 3D Aircraft Displays

Perception aspects on perspective aircraft displays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About