2012
DOI: 10.1075/tsl.100.21pet
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to put and take in Kalasha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the elaborate processes of derivational affixation, reduplication, and rich pronominal and demonstrative distinctions, the characteristics of the Jahai language are extremely complex [15]. Between 2004 and 2008, Burenhalt N. published a series of studies on Jahai language, including descriptions of bodily parts [16], hydrological lexicon [17], landscape words and typonyms [18], and placement and removal events [19]. Later, other researchers expanded on Burenhalt's work, such as Wierzbicka [20] on semantic topology and Wegener [21] on Savosavo ethnic body parts.…”
Section: Jahai Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the elaborate processes of derivational affixation, reduplication, and rich pronominal and demonstrative distinctions, the characteristics of the Jahai language are extremely complex [15]. Between 2004 and 2008, Burenhalt N. published a series of studies on Jahai language, including descriptions of bodily parts [16], hydrological lexicon [17], landscape words and typonyms [18], and placement and removal events [19]. Later, other researchers expanded on Burenhalt's work, such as Wierzbicka [20] on semantic topology and Wegener [21] on Savosavo ethnic body parts.…”
Section: Jahai Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Spanish and Basque, it seems that force and intention do not play a pivotal role in the patterns of argument realization; however, they can be considered as the factors, which contribute to the asymmetry hypothesis in placement vs. removal events. Petersen (2012) investigates the linguistic encoding of 'put' and 'take' events in Kalasha, an Indo-Aryan language spoken in Northwest Pakistan. He argues that the asymmetry hypothesis in placement vs. removal events is attested at different levels in this language; however, this asymmetry can be observed in favor of put expressions or in favor of take expressions.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argues that the asymmetry hypothesis in placement vs. removal events is attested at different levels in this language; however, this asymmetry can be observed in favor of put expressions or in favor of take expressions. Petersen (2012) makes clear that 'take' predicates are more numerous and diverse in the language compared to 'put' predicates, however, when it comes to the use of the postposition kai in locative constructions, put events show more degree of diversity. Lakusta and Landau (2012) assess the descriptions of motion events to see if the Goalover-Source predominance hypothesis observed in language has a cognitive basis.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gehrke (2008) -contra Nam (2004) -argues that the Goal bias is only cognitive and is not necessarily expressed in semantic or syntactic asymmetries between Goals and Sources (but see Landau & Zukowski 2003;Lakusta & Landau 2005). Similarly, Kopecka (2012) uses the 'put and take' stimuli (Bowerman, Gullberg, Majid, & Narasimhan 2004) to elicit descriptions of 'putting' (i.e., Goal-profiled) and 'taking' (i.e., Source-profiled) events in Polish, showing that the linguistic encoding of the two path types is equally frequent (see also Ishibashi 2010;Petersen 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%