How To Prevent Creativity Mismanagement

Badawy, Michael K.

doi:10.1080/00345334.1986.11756980

Cited by 22 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, H4, H5, and H6 hypotheses were not supported. Thus the results of this study are dissimilar to the findings of existing studies (Badawy, 1986;Gumusluoglu & Ilsev, 2009;Bosiaok, 2013;Patel, 2017;Wu & Lin, 2018;Audenaert & Decrame, 2018). The previous studies investigating the effect of leadership on creativity are not composed of entrepreneurs while the sample of this study is composed of entrepreneurs and it can be explained as follows: Entrepreneurs don't like work under the guidance of another leader since they already leaders and thus they cannot perform a creativity.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 79%

An Investigation on Creativity Performance in the Context of Leadership Styles and Individual Entrepreneurship

Sözbilir

2019

bmij

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Entrepreneurs are similar to leaders in terms of individual characteristics. At the same time, entrepreneurs who have high creative performance are considered as successful. This study aims to determine the impact of leadership styles (LS); democratic, managerial, and charismatic leadership on individual entrepreneurship perception’s (IEP) dimensions; planning, self-confidence, communication, motivation, and self-discipline, and impact of IEP’s dimensions on creativity performance (CP). In this empirical study, the data were collected from 286 entrepreneurs in Turkey. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS software and presented in tables. Internal consistency, composite reliability and convergent validity analyses results are sufficient. The findings showed that most of the LS’s dimensions have positive and significant impact on IEP’s dimensions. However, LS-Managerial hasn’t got a significant impact on Self-discipline dimension of IEP. LS’s all dimensions, except Charismatic, also have impact on CP. The other hand IEP’s dimensions have positive and significant impact on CP except Self-discipline.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 79%

An Investigation on Creativity Performance in the Context of Leadership Styles and Individual Entrepreneurship

Sözbilir

2019

bmij

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3 Innovation is a process that transforms inventions into value at the firm level (Lazonick 2005). Creativity is an important element in innovation, as it aims to develop organizations with the ability to process innovation, so that the result is new, unique and meaningful (Badawy 1986). National culture does influence economic creativity, and innovation implementation explains some of the variation in prosperity across countries (Williams and McGuire 2010).…”

Section: Innovation and Smesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A counting multidimensional innovation index for SMEs

Pereira

Araújo²,

Costa

2018

BIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We developed a Counting Multidimensional Innovation Index (MII) framework for measuring and benchmarking innovation of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), groups of SMEs, industries, regions, and countries. The methodology behind the MII is similar to the methodology behind the United Nations Multidimensional Poverty Index and follows the innovation definitions stipulated by the OECD Oslo Manual, covering dimensions and partial indicators suggested by this Manual and/or adapted from the Innovation Union Scoreboard (IUS) and from the Global Innovation Index (GII). To illustrate the MII framework, a survey was conducted among SMEs of the metalworking industry in Portugal.

show abstract

“…Shahin and Sadeghbeigi (2010, p. 38) stated that “creativity is the process of idea generation” and innovation is “the process of changing ideas into know‐how and finally, a product”. Badaway (1988) addressed creativity as the process of generating a new thing and innovation as the process of making a new thing applicable. Apparently, the definition of innovation has been precisely changed over the past 30 years.…”

Section: Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prioritization of innovation factors by the integration of concurrent function deployment and P diagram with a case study in Sepahan Industry Group

Shahin

Bakhshi²

2013

Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this research is to propose a new model for the integration of concurrent function deployment (CFD) and parameter (P) diagram in order to prioritize innovation factors.Design/methodology/approachEach of the approaches of CFD and P diagram and their features has been demonstrated and according to their common features, an integrated model has been designed in two phases. It has been examined in Sepahan Industrial Group, of which the major product is API gas pipeline network demanded by Isfahan Province Gas Organization. A questionnaire has been designed and delivered to four major units of Isfahan Province Gas Organization.Findings“Hydrostatic test” and “number of close end branch pipes” with the average values of 4.78 and 3.31 have been found as the first and last priorities of importance to customers, respectively. The output of the first phase includes “equipments” as the first priority of control factors, and “changing market or customers wants” as the first priority of noise factors. The results of the second phase show that “fault‐free product” and “successful innovation outcomes” are, respectively, recognized as first priorities of response factors. Finally, “successful innovation outcomes” has been determined as the first priority of response factors.Research limitations/implicationsThe matrixes of the two phases could become larger if the number of factors in the P diagram increases, and therefore, filling and analyzing the matrixes might become time consuming and difficult.Originality/valueThe proposed integrated model can be effective for almost all organizations that aim to meet the dynamic needs of markets and customers and intend to incorporate innovation in their products and services. By the new approach, determination and prioritization of innovation factors can be done based on customers' viewpoint, while in the traditional approaches this was done only from the viewpoint of engineers and designers.

show abstract

How To Prevent Creativity Mismanagement

Cited by 22 publications

References 2 publications

An Investigation on Creativity Performance in the Context of Leadership Styles and Individual Entrepreneurship

An Investigation on Creativity Performance in the Context of Leadership Styles and Individual Entrepreneurship

A counting multidimensional innovation index for SMEs

Prioritization of innovation factors by the integration of concurrent function deployment and P diagram with a case study in Sepahan Industry Group

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About