2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11186-008-9066-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to model an institution

Abstract: Institutions are linkage mechanisms that bridge across three kinds of social divides-they link micro systems of social interaction to meso (and macro) levels of organization, they connect the symbolic with the material, and the agentic with the structural. Two key analytic principles are identified for empirical research, relationality and duality. These are linked to new research strategies for the study of institutions that draw on network analytic techniques. Two hypotheses are suggested. (1) Institutional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
122
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
122
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…7. Index-plot for the six groups, mobility students' careers Through the studying of the mobility among faculties/courses as a population migration and thinking of the institution (Sapienza) as a multitude of elements, variously connected among each other (Mohr and White 2008), the Social Network Analysis (SNA) tools are used to identify structure characteristics of the mobility (Graph 8).…”
Section: Graph 5 Most Frequent Careers Of the Mobility Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. Index-plot for the six groups, mobility students' careers Through the studying of the mobility among faculties/courses as a population migration and thinking of the institution (Sapienza) as a multitude of elements, variously connected among each other (Mohr and White 2008), the Social Network Analysis (SNA) tools are used to identify structure characteristics of the mobility (Graph 8).…”
Section: Graph 5 Most Frequent Careers Of the Mobility Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the feedback processes which are at the core of the models make them particularly suitable for analyzing longitudinal, chronically reproduced (Jepperson 1991) processes such as diffusion and institutionalization. In other words, they explicitly model dynamic "systems of interaction" (Schelling 1978: 14) among actors, wherein actor level "micromotives" and population level "macrobehaviors" are continuously influenced by each other (Mohr and White 2008, Powell and Colyvas 2008, Zucker 1977. Second, agent based models do not require audiences to directly and explicitly influence actor decision making.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 MOHR -WHITE (2008), p. 493. We may make up stories alone (e.g., in diary entries), or in conversation with others (e.g., in gossip), or we may learn them from other sources (e.g., onlookers, the media).…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of a 'Social Network Theory'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate this idea, this paper will offer two brief case studies to suggest some ways in which we might view ancient evidence for ritual activity through the prism of a social network theory. In some ways both of these 39 The difficulty of defining institutions is discussed by MOHR -WHITE (2008), p. 488. 40 It comprises a series of dualities: at the individual level, between mind and body; at the group level, between story and network; at the institutional level, between rhetoric and systems of social organisation: see MOHR -WHITE (2008), p. 496, and the Indian caste system, p. 496-500.…”
Section: Network and Ancient Greek Religion: Two Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation