How to measure trust: the percolation model applied to intra-organisational knowledge sharing networks

Abstract

Purpose The present paper aims to explore how to measure trust as a receptivity force in an intra-organisational knowledge-sharing network with the help of self-developed algorithms of modelling percolations. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, a completely new methodology is applied by using a sample study of an international company’s financial centre as an example. Computer software has been developed to simulate the network and calculate the percolation thresholds by combining its characteristics, thereby revealing what and to what extent connectivity and trust, respectively, influence knowledge sharing. Findings The application of computer modelling to build up a percolation network is useful for answering questions about the determinants of knowledge sharing. Arguably, the authors demonstrate how the applied new methodology is superior in addressing how to measure the critical values of trust, connectivity and interaction issues, as well as leading to better insights about how these can be managed. The present paper confirms that trust is an essential factor influencing knowledge sharing and that there is a reciprocal effect between social interaction and trust. Practical implications The model provides a useful tool for assessing features of the intra-organisational knowledge-sharing network and thus an important foundation for implementing actions in practice. The findings of this study imply that managers should consider the important role of task-related trust between actors and in general for knowledge sharing. With the help of percolation modelling, the degree of trust in an organisation can be computed, and this provides managers with an approach for managing trust. Originality/value The topic of “how can trust be measured” is very important and is becoming even more important now because the financial crisis and other issues are raising questions about trust and moral compass rather than financial data. A percolation-based approach to studying knowledge sharing has not been researched in depth before now, and this study attempts to fill that gap. Fundamentally, this multidisciplinary research adds value to the theoretical foundation of the percolation network and research methodology to be used in social sciences and gives an example of their potential practical implications.

Human Resource Management Contributions to Knowledge Sharing for a Sustainability-Oriented Performance: A Mixed Methods Approach

“…Authors such as Meyer et al [34] show that affective commitment is highly beneficial to the firm. In addition, affective commitment is strongly associated with good behaviors [35], e.g., sharing new knowledge, mutual help, making extra effort, and ethical conduct [36,37]. We therefore propose that affective commitment is an important driver of KS [10,11].…”

Internal vs. external R&D teams: Evidences from the Italian wine industry

“…Considering the assumption of Kleinet al (1978:297), the analysis here proposed starts from the consideration that "...profit maximizing firms will undertake those activities that they find cheaper to administer internally than to purchase it in the market" (Klein et al, 1978, p 297).In such choices, firmsoften rely on hybrid solutions. Therefore, cooperation models represent an option and, among them, the alliance types are the one of the most recalled when dealing with R&D company's decisions.When applied in regard toR&D activities,TCT underlined problems related to uncertainty and the risk of opportunistic behaviour by alliance partners (Khvatova et al, 2016;Rutten et al, 2016;Del Giudice, 2012;Williamson, 1991;1985b), as the main considerations that a manager should take into account with priority. According to Beverland's (2000) findings, alliance formation in the wine sector is likely to be found when a company operates in both highly competitive and uncertain markets, with the aim to sharing knowledge with partners and, at the same time, gain market access.…”

A Percolation-Like Process of Within-Organization Collective Corruption: A Computational Approach

“…Given that percolation signifies how new information is conveyed from the one end to the other (Khvatova, Block, Zhukov, & Lesko, 2016; Radicchi & Castellano, 2016; Ruan et al, 2015; Zhukov et al, 2017), we specify the percolation-based formation process of collective corruption in terms of (a) initiation of corruption (i.e., an opportunistic and self-interest seeking nature), (b) its dissemination, and (c) feedback from the dissemination. To model this process, we hold three assumptions.…”