2018
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8110415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment

Abstract: Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the basic geomorphological and forcing characteristics, the socioeconomic context reaches more importance in any vulnerability assessment because the changes of coastal systems due to social, economic, and built-environment variables occur frequently and rapidly, even more than those due to physical processes [118,119] (Figure 1). For example, Narra et al [43] proposed the coastal-erosion risk assessment methodology CERA2.0 that considers indicators as population density, infrastructures, and ecology, together with geomorphology, coastal defenses, and short-and long-term shoreline erosion due to extreme events.…”
Section: Complementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the basic geomorphological and forcing characteristics, the socioeconomic context reaches more importance in any vulnerability assessment because the changes of coastal systems due to social, economic, and built-environment variables occur frequently and rapidly, even more than those due to physical processes [118,119] (Figure 1). For example, Narra et al [43] proposed the coastal-erosion risk assessment methodology CERA2.0 that considers indicators as population density, infrastructures, and ecology, together with geomorphology, coastal defenses, and short-and long-term shoreline erosion due to extreme events.…”
Section: Complementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of difficulties in obtaining and classifying the socio-economic data, such parameters are often excluded from the CVI calculation. it is worth noting that the CVI calculation proposed by ( Gornitz et al, 1994 ; Koroglu et al, 2019 ) has been adopted in several studies to assess coastal vulnerability and that, often, the parameters representative of coastal vulnerability is combined in different types of ICVI ( Cogswell et al, 2018 ; De Serio et al, 2018 ; Doukakis, 2005 ; McLaughlin and Cooper, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is increasingly used in the design of decision support systems based on a multi-attribute approach since it is easy to implement in computer systems and its mathematical model presents a relatively simple algebraic calculation [34]. This method has been used to design decision systems, such as risk zones and landslide susceptibility mapping (e.g., [42][43][44][45]), earthquake hazard (e.g., [46]), flood zones (e.g., [47,48]), and coastal vulnerability assessment (e.g., [22,[49][50][51][52][53]). The advantages of this method are pointed out in [34].…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%