2014
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2014.966053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to correct teaching methods that favour plagiarism: recommendations from teachers and students in a Spanish language distance education university

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, more educational and less repressive environments may promote less resentment on the part of students and tend to reduce the propensity to comment on academic fraud. This was an idea advocated by students who participated in focus groups and is also suggested in several studies [8,18,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, more educational and less repressive environments may promote less resentment on the part of students and tend to reduce the propensity to comment on academic fraud. This was an idea advocated by students who participated in focus groups and is also suggested in several studies [8,18,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is increasingly argued that educational organisations should also take on the integrity strategy [8,18,[40][41][42][43], and there is research that highlights the relationship between teaching-learning methods and the lesser or greater propensity for students to adopt bad academic behaviour. It can also be argued that this position reflects the point of view of teachers and institutions and not so much that of learners, who value disciplinary strategy more [44].…”
Section: Measures To Combat Academic Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chankova (2017) näeb tahtliku plagiaadi ennetamise ja vähendamise võimalusena õppeprotsessi, mitte õpitulemuste väärtustamist. Lisaks saavad õppejõud anda üliõpilastele atraktiivsemaid ülesandeid, mis nõuavad teadmiste rakendamist, individuaalset analüüsi ja sünteesi ning mille vastuseid ei saa internetist lihtsa vaevaga kätte (Espinoza & Nájera, 2015;Seifried, Lenhard, & Spinath, 2015).…”
Section: Plagiaadi Leviku Pidurdamise Võimalusedunclassified
“…Students' academic behaviour is also influenced by the faculties' attitudes to plagiarism (Marshall & Garry, 2005). The confusion of faculty members about plagiarism and what it entails (Espinoza & Nájera, 2015) and their inability to implement penalties (Pickard, 2006) send mixed signals to students. Studies have also shown that students recognise plagiarism as unethical but are not able to describe how to make a proper citation (Adam et al, 2017) or recognise different forms of plagiarism (Marshall & Garry, 2005;Bokosmaty et al, 2017).…”
Section: Kas Utatud Kirjandusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cummings (2003) suggests that creative assignments would divert the attention of students from seeking direct answers from the internet or online sources. Assignments which have straightforward answers rather than exploration of "what if" scenarios for instance, may not be productive in eliciting deep-learning from the students (Arce Espinoza & Monge Nájera, 2014).…”
Section: The Evolving Educational Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%