How to Communicate Food Safety after Radiological Contamination: The Effectiveness of Numerical and Narrative News Messages

Abstract

Food risk and the safety of foodstuffs in the aftermath of contamination are highly sensitive issues to communicate. Food risks receive extensive attention from the news media, which requires messages to be carefully drafted to minimize harm and avoid unnecessary boycotts. Once a food risk is deemed eliminated, communication efforts must rebuild trust among consumers. The latter is a particularly difficult task after radiological contamination. This study tests whether numerical messages, narrative messages, or messages combining both elements are more effective in persuading the public to consume foodstuffs from Fukushima, a region that continues to battle stigma since the nuclear accident in 2011. We employ a survey-embedded experiment on a sample of the general Belgian population (N = 1085), during which respondents are presented with a mock news article presenting either a (1) numerical, (2) narrative, or (3) a combined message and test their subsequent evaluation of the article. We find that the numerical message leads to significantly higher perceived credibility and message acceptance than both the combined and the narrative message. Furthermore, we find that attitudes towards nuclear energy have a strong independent effect on message acceptance and evaluation, with those respondents who report a more positive stance towards nuclear energy more readily accepting the message. Food risk and safety communication may thus benefit from adopting a more detached, numerical approach for sensitive issues.

Developing a Messaging Graphic for Storage Times of Refrigerated Ready to Eat (RTE) Foods for a Consumer Food Safety Health Campaign

“…This overall effect indicates that a specific graphics could produce a positive effect on intended behavior. Providing a graphic is critical both to providing the information needed by the consumer in a simple format [ 42 ] and also provides a meaningful “anchor” that is needed by consumers to help mitigate perceptual bias that can underestimate food safety risk [ 74 ]. Because the graphic was the most prominent feature of the schematics viewed by consumers, its importance, relative to other components in the overall message, could be explained easily.…”

“…Similarly, authors have found differences in the ways in which information is provided in nutrition education displays among older and younger consumers and some ethnic groups [ 40 , 41 ]. Other authors have shown that many consumers preferred a simpler “more detached” approach to understanding food safety risks associated with food radiation risks [ 42 ].…”

Positioning Phytosanitary Food Treatments: Exploring the Role of Business-to-Consumer Stakeholder Literacy as an Information Gatekeeper in New Zealand

“…They saw education from a range of independent sources for consumers as important, and were confident that consumers would become self-informed [ 35 ]. Previous studies have concluded that consumers will view a reduction in the perceived risk once education on the benefits and reassurance about the safety of the technology is provided [ 36 , 37 , 38 ]. In practice, creating a consistent narrative about sustainability and the low-beam nature of the radiation, to alleviate concerns for those who seek more information, needs to be carefully designed by stakeholders.…”

Information Dissemination and Control of NIMBY Projects under Stigmatization

“…Under the communication advantages of information technology, it is easy to form stigma, but it is difficult to "destigmatize" and reconstruct trust [20,21].…”