2021
DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to best conduct universal HIV screening in emergency departments is far from settled

Abstract: HIV screening in the emergency department (ED), including universal screening irrespective of risk assessments, has shown strong promise in past studies, identifying many new cases of HIV infection among those who lack access to traditional HIV testing services. Yet, over the years a consistent set of challenges and limitations have presented themselves in settings throughout the United States. We review considerations for evaluating and improving the success of ED-based HIV screening programs in the United St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the United States, EDs serve as a safety net for medically underserved patients without access to alternative forms of health care. 3 Furthermore, EDs serve populations disproportionately affected by HIV, 4 regularly treat patients presenting with viral syndrome symptoms, 5 and routinely collect blood as a part of patient care. 6 Despite previous work by our group demonstrating that 24% of patients presenting to a subset of US EDs reported having never been tested for HIV (23% of whom reported engaging in recent ongoing HIV risk-taking behaviors), 7 only a minority of EDs offer routine HIV testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the United States, EDs serve as a safety net for medically underserved patients without access to alternative forms of health care. 3 Furthermore, EDs serve populations disproportionately affected by HIV, 4 regularly treat patients presenting with viral syndrome symptoms, 5 and routinely collect blood as a part of patient care. 6 Despite previous work by our group demonstrating that 24% of patients presenting to a subset of US EDs reported having never been tested for HIV (23% of whom reported engaging in recent ongoing HIV risk-taking behaviors), 7 only a minority of EDs offer routine HIV testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study was conducted at a single site, the results are likely generalizable to other urban trauma centers serving populations with relatively high prevalence of HIV. While routine, opt-out HIV screening is now common in EDs throughout the US, implementation and participation vary, [ 2 ] and high acuity patients such as those presenting with major trauma, may be more likely to be excluded from screening. At the same time, this study shows that trauma patients may have higher rates of HIV than other ED patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routine emergency department (ED) HIV screening has been recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) since 2006 1 and has been shown to have a positive impact on screening rates [ 2 ]. Routine screening has been implemented at many EDs around the country, with published screening rates generally around 25–30% of all eligible patients [ 3 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic health record‐based opportunistic HIV screenings in EDs allow for the identification of new HIV cases among people who may underestimate their exposure risk or lack access to traditional HIV testing services [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. They are also useful for detecting and controlling possible local disease outbreaks [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%