The COVID-19 pandemic has had negative consequences on HIV care and prevention programs, including routine HIV screening in health care settings. 1 This has serious implications for the Ending the HIV Epidemic plan for the United States. 2 Herein, we report the results of incorporating phlebotomy for universal HIV screening into COVID-19 testing at The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) emergency department (ED) for the purpose of maintaining screening volumes.Methods | The institutional review board at the UCM Medical Center granted exemption for this project because the data set analyzed contained deidentified data. We reviewed data from the Expanded HIV Testing and Linkage to Care Program, a collaboration between 13 health care centers on the South and West sides of Chicago, during the COVID-19 pandemic. 3 Sites include community health centers, community hospitals, and academic hospitals, including 5 EDs, all of which implemented opt-out HIV screening according to guidelines. 4 Since 2016, sites perform combination HIV antigen-antibody testing and have processes for rapid linkage to care and antiretroviral initiation for patients with acute HIV infection (AHI). 5 The ED at UCM designed a rapid
Background Routine opt-out HIV testing in healthcare settings is often not implemented to its fullest extent. We assessed factors contributing to missed HIV testing opportunities at an academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois, with a routine HIV screening program. Methods Retrospective analysis of HIV testing in clinical encounters was performed using multivariate regession models. Missed opportunities were defined as 1) an encounter during which an HIV test was not conducted on a patient later diagnosed with HIV, or 2) an encounter in which a bacterial STI test was performed without HIV testing. Results Of 122 people newly diagnosed with HIV from 2011-2018, 98 patients had 1215 prior encounters, of which 82.8% were missed opportunities. Female gender, persons not known to be men who have sex with men, and encounter location other than inpatient had higher odds of a missed opportunity. Nearly half (48.4%) of 104,678 bacterial STI testing encounters were missed opportunities. Female gender, older age, lack of syphilis testing, and location outside the emergency department had higher odds of a missed opportunity. Conclusions We found a high number of missed HIV testing opportunities, which could be reduced by strengthening routine screening and increasing targeted testing concurrent with STI screening.
Background: Many people vulnerable to HIV do not perceive themselves at risk or consider preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). This study hypothesizes that syphilis diagnosis through universal, emergency department (ED) screening would increase PrEP uptake.Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients tested for syphilis through ED screening between July 2019 and July 2021. Participants completed a survey about behaviors, HIV and PrEP knowledge, and opinions at the time of enrollment. All were offered PrEP if they met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for PrEP use. Information about PrEP use and HIV status was collected 6 months later. Bivariate analysis was used to compare outcomes between groups testing positive versus negative for syphilis.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted routine HIV screening in healthcare settings. This has serious implications, especially for patients with acute HIV infection (AHI) presenting with symptoms suggesting COVID-19 infection. This is a high priority population for rapid linkage to care (LTC) and initiation of HAART. Methods We reviewed data from our eXpanded HIV Testing and LTC (X-TLC) Program, a collaboration effort between 13 healthcare centers on the South and West Sides of Chicago. Since 2016, most sites had 4th or 5th generation HIV Ag/Ab testing available. Results Most sites experienced reductions in HIV screens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Advanced planning by our ED incorporated blood draws for HIV screens as part of COVID-19 evaluations. UCM performed 19,111 HIV screens (11,133 in the ED) between 1/1/20 and 8/17/20, along with 100,635 COVID PCRs (14,754 in ED) between 3/17/20 and 8/17/20. Nine patients were diagnosed with AHI after the first case of COVID-19 in Chicago (1/24/20), and 7 were diagnosed after the first case of community transmission in Cook County (3/8/20). All cases of AHI were diagnosed in the ED. The rate of AHI was significantly higher in 2020 versus the prior 4 years (14.4 vs 6.8 per year, p < 0.05). AHI patients comprised 25.7 % (9/35) of all new diagnoses, the highest percent ever. There were 7 men (6 identified as MSM) and 2 cis-gender women, median age of 25 years (21 to 28 years). The median viral load was 6 million (115,000 to > 6 million) copies/mL. Eight of 9 patients presented with an illness indistinguishable from COVID-19, including 1co-infected patient. All were LTC and started on HAART from time of PCR result within a median of 1 day (0–38), but 3 days (range 1–41) from sample collection as a result of delayed reflex PCR confirmatory testing due to high demands on lab personnel and scarcity of reagents due to COVID-19 PCR volumes (since resolved). HIV Screening and COVID-19 Testing in the ED During COVID-19 Conclusion Continued HIV screening in our ED during the COVID-19 pandemic identified an increased number of patients with AHI. These individuals may be more likely to present for care due to fear of COVID-19 infection. We achieved rapid LTC and initiation of HAART without any incremental increases in resources. All HIV screening programs should incorporate blood-based HIV screening into their COVID-19 testing programs. Disclosures Moira McNulty, MD, MS, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support)
Limited published data suggest rates of HIV may be high among trauma patients. This study compares rates of HIV screening and diagnosis among trauma and medical patients at a Level 1 trauma center emergency department (ED) with a universal HIV screening program. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of all ED encounters from May 1, 2018, through May 1, 2021. Duplicate encounters, encounters with repeat testing within one year, and patients younger than 18 or older than 65 were excluded. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare demographics, rates of HIV testing, new and known HIV infections, and linkage to care between trauma and medical patients. After exclusion criteria were applied, 147,430 encounters from 91,468 unique patients were analyzed. Trauma comprised 7,497 (5.4%) encounters. Trauma patients were less likely to be screened for HIV than medical patients (18.1% vs 25.6%; OR 0.64; 95%CI, 0.61–0.68, p < .01). Trauma patients had higher rates of HIV (2.2% vs 1.3%; OR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.22–2.58, p < .01). Both trauma and medical patients would benefit from strategies to increase screening. Including trauma patients in routine ED HIV screening should be a priority to increase diagnosis rate and linkage to care in key populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.