2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Achieve Carbon Neutrality: From the Perspective of Innovative City Pilot Policy in China

Abstract: The innovative city pilot policy is a new engine to accelerate the social development of China, which is an important support feature for realizing sustainable economic development. Using the city pilot policy issued by the Chinese government in 2008 as a quasi-natural experiment and the method of multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) model, we explore the effect of the policy on regional carbon emission efficiency. The research shows that the innovative city pilot policy could lead a significant promot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the economic potential and environmental potential of the NICP policy since China established Shenzhen as the first national innovation-oriented city in 2008, relevant literature has been developed around three aspects: Firstly, findings on the economic effect of the NICP policy indicate that it has a noteworthy and affirmative impact on the enhancement of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) quality [18], industrial structure upgrading [19], green efficiency of the logistics industry [20], and green total factor productivity [21]. Secondly, findings on the environmental effect of the NICP policy show that it can significantly improve energy productivity [22], green total factor energy efficiency [23], carbon emission efficiency [24], carbon emission intensity [25], and carbon lock-in [26,27]. Thirdly, findings on the innovation effect of the NICP policy show that it is conducive to promoting the flow of knowledge between industry, academia, and research institutions [28,29], city brand [30], green innovation efficiency [31], and green technology progress [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the economic potential and environmental potential of the NICP policy since China established Shenzhen as the first national innovation-oriented city in 2008, relevant literature has been developed around three aspects: Firstly, findings on the economic effect of the NICP policy indicate that it has a noteworthy and affirmative impact on the enhancement of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) quality [18], industrial structure upgrading [19], green efficiency of the logistics industry [20], and green total factor productivity [21]. Secondly, findings on the environmental effect of the NICP policy show that it can significantly improve energy productivity [22], green total factor energy efficiency [23], carbon emission efficiency [24], carbon emission intensity [25], and carbon lock-in [26,27]. Thirdly, findings on the innovation effect of the NICP policy show that it is conducive to promoting the flow of knowledge between industry, academia, and research institutions [28,29], city brand [30], green innovation efficiency [31], and green technology progress [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to L. Liu et al, the enormous market for new technologies and products is one of China's primary benefits of green investment. In addition, the country is one of the largest energy consumers in the world, so introducing energy-efficient technologies and renewable energy sources presents substantial investment opportunities [7].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, many academics have established the effectiveness of government policies in promoting the capacity of green technology innovation [15][16][17]. Some studies confirm that incentive-and-support policies can alleviate market failure in R&D activities and stimulate green technology innovation [18][19][20][21][22][23], for example, providing R&D subsidies or tax breaks, opening green credit channels, and establishing emission trading markets. Other studies point out that command-and-control policies are more stimulating [24][25][26].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%