2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1187082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Timely are Earnings When Costs are Sticky? Implications for the Link Between Conditional Conservatism and Cost Stickiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, ABJ, Subramaniam and Weidenmier (2003), Calleja et al, (2006), and Via and Perego, (2013) examined different specific firm-based measures of intensity: assets intensity, employees intensity, debt financing intensity, and working capital intensity. Other research examined corporate governance characteristics (e.g., Calleja et al, 2003;2006;Chen et al, 2008;2012), cost structure (Homburg & Nasev, 2008;Balakrishnan et al, 2010), technological constraints (Anderson & Lanen, 2007;Kama & Weis, 2010), conditional conservatism or good news or bad news factor (Ball & Shivakumar, 2005;Beaver & Ryan, 2005), industry (Subramaniam & Weidenmier, 2003;Anderson & Lanen, 2009;Via & Perego, (2013), agency theory and empire-building factors (Richardson, 2006;Chen et al, 2008;2012), and growth (e.g., Banker & Chen, 2006;Dierynck & Renders, 2009;He et al, 2010;Banker et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ABJ, Subramaniam and Weidenmier (2003), Calleja et al, (2006), and Via and Perego, (2013) examined different specific firm-based measures of intensity: assets intensity, employees intensity, debt financing intensity, and working capital intensity. Other research examined corporate governance characteristics (e.g., Calleja et al, 2003;2006;Chen et al, 2008;2012), cost structure (Homburg & Nasev, 2008;Balakrishnan et al, 2010), technological constraints (Anderson & Lanen, 2007;Kama & Weis, 2010), conditional conservatism or good news or bad news factor (Ball & Shivakumar, 2005;Beaver & Ryan, 2005), industry (Subramaniam & Weidenmier, 2003;Anderson & Lanen, 2009;Via & Perego, (2013), agency theory and empire-building factors (Richardson, 2006;Chen et al, 2008;2012), and growth (e.g., Banker & Chen, 2006;Dierynck & Renders, 2009;He et al, 2010;Banker et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have given prominence to the linkage between cost stickiness and accounting conservatism. In this context, according to Homburg and Nasev (2008), cost stickiness is the manager's decision when the sale level decreases. Therefore, the project of cost stickiness is considered as risky.…”
Section: Cost Stickiness and Conditional Conservatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find holding costs of unused capacity and capacity releases, for example, wages and depreciation (Reimer, 2019). On the other hand, if managers choose to maintain unutilized resources for economic considerations such as adjustment costs of reducing capacity and ramping up capacity in case sales rebound, this choice is interpreted as a risky project (Homburg and Nasev, 2008). This choice can be made for the interest of managers or for the interest of the company.…”
Section: Cost Stickiness and Conditional Conservatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations