2014
DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v7n8p113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Asymmetrical Behavior of Cost: Evidence from Jordan

Abstract: The study investigates whether different types of cost accounts are sticky or anti-sticky cost behavior using all listed Jordanian manufacturing companies during the period 2008-2012. Also, the study examines the effect of some explanatory factors on cost stickiness. These factors are asset intensity, debt intensity, free cash flow and growth. The study finds anti-sticky cost behavior for cost of goods sold, and selling expenses, while the cost behavior for SG&A and Administration costs is found to be symmetri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0
12

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
16
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Something similar was also presented by Abu-Serdaneh [23] in his study, when he discovered antisticky cost behaviour for the costs of goods sold and selling expenses, while the cost behaviour for SG&A and administration costs was found to be symmetrical, exhibiting neither stickiness nor anti-stickiness. The CGS model shows an increased degree of stickiness for companies with high asset intensity, whereas a lesser degree of stickiness was discerned for free cash flow.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Something similar was also presented by Abu-Serdaneh [23] in his study, when he discovered antisticky cost behaviour for the costs of goods sold and selling expenses, while the cost behaviour for SG&A and administration costs was found to be symmetrical, exhibiting neither stickiness nor anti-stickiness. The CGS model shows an increased degree of stickiness for companies with high asset intensity, whereas a lesser degree of stickiness was discerned for free cash flow.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Such cost behaviour is referred to as rigid or fast-moving. [23] For instance, Grolms [24] discusses this issue, describing the concept of "Kostenremanenz" in Germany, and states that this problem appeared in the first half of the 20th century. The importance of this issue is also the subject of a study by Japanese authors Pichetkun and Panmanee, [25], who utilized regression analysis for the behaviour of costs and their explanation of the causes of sticky costs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of cost stickiness, is an asymmetric behaviour of costs that depends on the changes in sales decisions, especially when sales decline [8]. The same thing about the sticky costs is also defined by Serdaneh as an asymmetrical behaviour of costs where the rigid cost incurred in effect of the changes of activity [9]. Ratnawati and Nugrahanti define that sticky cost will be indicated in disproportionate cost changes when sales activity increase and decrease [4].…”
Section: B Sticky Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Однак сучасні емпіричні дослідження документують асиметричну відповідь витрат на збільшення чи зменшення обсягів виробництва. Асиметричні витрати -це феномен, за якого реакція витрат на зниження ділової активності менша або більша, ніж реакція витрат на збільшення активності; така поведінка витрат ідентифікується як «липка (клейка)» (sticky) або «анти-липка» (anti-sticky) [1].…”
unclassified