2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11205739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the Urban Neighborhood Environment Influences the Quality of Life of Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Influence Model of “NE-QoL”

Abstract: Due to functional impairment and low mobility, the sphere of activities of older adults often shrinks and they rely on their living environment more. Especially for urban community-dwelling older adults who are aging in place, the urban neighborhood environment affects their quality of life (QoL) heavily. This study aims to explore how the urban neighborhood environment affects QoL of community-dwelling older adults and develop a mediation model called "Neighborhood Environment-Quality of Life (NE-QoL)" for co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most salient feature in the studies was the presence of and access to natural areas, such as green and blue spaces ( Table 2 —a more detailed table is provided in Supplemental Appendix 4). Natural areas were associated with well-being in three out of four quantitative studies ( Sugiyama & Thompson, 2006 ; Yu et al, 2019 ; Zhang & Li, 2019a , 2019b ). These spaces were also strongly associated with enjoyment and reflection in qualitative studies, as they provide pleasurable passive interactions, including observing people, engaging in small talk, or sometimes offering small snacks (e.g., fruit) to others ( Coleman & Kearns, 2015 ; Ottoni et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most salient feature in the studies was the presence of and access to natural areas, such as green and blue spaces ( Table 2 —a more detailed table is provided in Supplemental Appendix 4). Natural areas were associated with well-being in three out of four quantitative studies ( Sugiyama & Thompson, 2006 ; Yu et al, 2019 ; Zhang & Li, 2019a , 2019b ). These spaces were also strongly associated with enjoyment and reflection in qualitative studies, as they provide pleasurable passive interactions, including observing people, engaging in small talk, or sometimes offering small snacks (e.g., fruit) to others ( Coleman & Kearns, 2015 ; Ottoni et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yan et al, 2015;Yan et al, 2014). In the remaining four, no significant effect was identified (Au et al, 2020;Smith & Gauthier, 1995;Zhang et al, 2019;Zhang & Li, 2019a, 2019b. The importance of good transit services and low floor vehicles was also highlighted in two qualitative studies (Coleman & Kearns, 2015;Finlay et al, 2018;Keene & Ruel, 2013).…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, descriptive items of factors of perceived neighborhood environment have been validated by "NE-QoL" model [33], and descriptive items of domains of QoL have been validated by WHO [12]. Thus, it was not necessary to conduct a validation test, but the reliability test was still essential to check the reliability of the questionnaire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these factors are professional concepts which may be hard to understand by many older adults, their perception of factors of the neighborhood environment cannot be measured directly. Thus, several descriptive items were designed to describe the perception with neighborhood environment in detail, which have already been validated [33]. Neighborhood environmental factors and descriptive items are shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Questionnaire Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Li [64] Neighborhood environment Accessibility to facilities, sidewalk condition, neighbor support, safety, etc Wann-Ming [58] Space, humanity, functionality, social connectivity Architectural planning space, space organization and accessibility, and green space; the relationship between people and society Han et al [23] Social environment, natural environment, transport accessibility Population density, the convenience of essential facilities, green space, distance to nearest public transit stations Nakamura [36] Access, amenity, safety, and cost Access to work, shop, school, and hospital; house size, streetscape, and green space; accident, crime, flood, and pollution; rent Putra and Sitanggang [42] Insurance, empathy, reliability, responsive, tangible, comfort Drivers' knowledge, security, drivers' help for passengers, waiting time, traveling time, information system, convenient service, cleanliness, first-aid facilities, appearances, seating availability, public transport using Air Condition Gunaruwan and Jayasekera [22] Social sustainability, health, education, and accessibility Maternal mortality, infant mortality, literacy, and life expectancy; bus kilometers millions per 10,000 population Jaskiewicz and Besta [24] Mobility (public transportation usage) Lack of care, level of availability, comfort, independence, reliability, meeting people, pride, safety Kim and Ulfarsson [29] ** Socio-demographics, health, neighborhood environment, transit stations, health Saxena et al [44] Physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environmental Daily activities, energy, fatigue, dependence, discomfort; leisure activities, transport, physical environment, etc Schneider et al [46] Access, design, environmental issues, maintenance, mobility, safety, and transparency Traffic flow, commute time, construction, congestion, travel time within and between communities, etc de Groot and Steg [9] ** Comfort, status, security, health, social justice, freedom, privacy, safety, work (22 indicators) Mollenkopf et al [34] Socio-structural, health-related, psychological factors, environmental conditions, and features of the person-environment interaction 97 parameters are defined (availability, security, social network)…”
Section: Qol Dimensions Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%