2019
DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2019.1636799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Static and Animated Pictures Contribute to Multi-level Mental Representations of Auditory Text in Seven-, Nine-, and Eleven-Year-Old Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
13
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these theories focus on the interplay of expository texts and charts, graphs, or schematic diagrams, their key assumptions seem to be applicable in the context of the current study. Previous research with narrative texts indicates that multimodality benefits children’s comprehension in general (see Carney and Levin ( 2002 ) for a review; Seger et al 2019 ; Wannagat et al 2018 ) and coherence formation in particular, but without differentiating between local and global coherence. Orrantia et al ( 2014 ) examined 9- and 11-year-old children’s ability to establish global coherence when reading illustrated and unillustrated narratives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these theories focus on the interplay of expository texts and charts, graphs, or schematic diagrams, their key assumptions seem to be applicable in the context of the current study. Previous research with narrative texts indicates that multimodality benefits children’s comprehension in general (see Carney and Levin ( 2002 ) for a review; Seger et al 2019 ; Wannagat et al 2018 ) and coherence formation in particular, but without differentiating between local and global coherence. Orrantia et al ( 2014 ) examined 9- and 11-year-old children’s ability to establish global coherence when reading illustrated and unillustrated narratives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both studies, the situation model was significantly improved when illustrations were present rather than absent; likewise, text surface representations appeared to benefit from illustrations. One study (Wannagat et al, 2018) revealed an opposite pattern of results at the textbase level, indicating that semantic representations of text are less accurate when the text is illustrated; this was not replicated in Seger et al (2019) research. In the latter study, dynamic illustrations produced similar results as static ones when accompanying auditory narrative text.…”
Section: Sentence Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Based on the above, we examined whether illustrations would make a difference in elementary school students' comprehension of auditory narrative text (Seger, Wannagat, & Nieding, 2019;Wannagat, Waizenegger, & Nieding, 2017;Wannagat, Waizenegger, Hauf, & Nieding, 2018). Wannagat et al (2018) asked their 7, 9 and 11 year-old participants to listen to stories that comprised six sentences each before they completed a sentence recognition task.…”
Section: Sentence Recognition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…이야기를 제시하는 방식은 청각적 제시(음성), 시청각 동시 제시 (음성+그림 또는 텍스트), 시각적 제시(텍스트)로 세분화될 수 있는 데, 이야기가 시청각적으로 동시 제시될 때 두 가지 감각양식은 상 호작용하며 전반적인 이야기 의미 이해에 기여하게 된다 (Cohn, 2016). 일반적으로 다중양식의 이야기 제시는 제한된 작업기억의 용량을 효율적으로 활용할 수 있게 하여 아동의 이해에 도움이 되 며, 시각적 제시 정보는 청각적으로 제시되는 음성언어 정보와 함께 병렬로 처리가 가능하다고 알려져 있다 (Carney & Levin, 2002;Seger, Wannagat, & Nieding, 2019). 즉, 시각적 텍스트를 읽는 과정 에서의 청각적 설명(또는 오디오북의 사용)은 아동들의 주의집중 을 유도하는 데 유용할 수 있다 (Krejtz, Szarkowska, Krejtz, Walczak, & Duchowski, 2012).…”
unclassified