2022
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How stable are visions for protected area management? Stakeholder perspectives before and during a pandemic

Abstract: Envisioning processes enable protected area managers to chart a course for future management to reach desired goals, but unexpected changes that could affect future visions are not usually considered. The global COVID‐19 pandemic provided an opportunity to explore changes in stakeholder visions, the values that underpin the visions, and their perceptions of landscape changes and the underlying drivers (e.g. climate change, mass tourism and demographic trends). Through a mixed‐methods approach in this post‐eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As recent work in SGNP found, multiple factors associated with the online format imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic and confinement policy might have limited the participation of stakeholders (Lo et al 2022). Nevertheless, it is important to note that our research aimed to explore the visual tool from a methodological perspective for which the participants' sample provided a wide range of valuable contributions for its comprehensive analysis.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recent work in SGNP found, multiple factors associated with the online format imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic and confinement policy might have limited the participation of stakeholders (Lo et al 2022). Nevertheless, it is important to note that our research aimed to explore the visual tool from a methodological perspective for which the participants' sample provided a wide range of valuable contributions for its comprehensive analysis.…”
Section: Methodological Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%