2020
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How special rewards in loyalty programs enrich consumer–brand relationships: The role of self‐expansion

Abstract: Although brands offer different kinds of rewards through their loyalty programs, little is known about how they can impact consumer–brand relationships and brand attitude. How do loyalty program rewards influence the consumer–brand relationship? And which kinds of rewards establish or maintain closer relationships between consumers and brands than others? To answer these questions, the present research makes use of self‐expansion theory (Aron & Aron, 1986) and two experiments that manipulate the extraordinary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(128 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Churners, in comparison to blanders and empathizers, have limited to no emotional connection with brands, and reflect characteristics linked to behavioral loyalty, which consists of repeated purchase behavior without having a psychological attachment to a brand (Gorlier & Michel, 2020 ). Azemi et al ( 2019 ) third customer group, impulsive customers, are defined as being more patient with service failures or with services they have little experience of in comparison to exigent and solutionist customers, who respond through negative electronic word of mouth (eWOM) following successful recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Churners, in comparison to blanders and empathizers, have limited to no emotional connection with brands, and reflect characteristics linked to behavioral loyalty, which consists of repeated purchase behavior without having a psychological attachment to a brand (Gorlier & Michel, 2020 ). Azemi et al ( 2019 ) third customer group, impulsive customers, are defined as being more patient with service failures or with services they have little experience of in comparison to exigent and solutionist customers, who respond through negative electronic word of mouth (eWOM) following successful recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, loyal customers' evaluation of service recoveries will differ depending on how they incorporate the circumstances of a crisis situation. Customers with no attachment to a brand may be indecisive regarding their perception of service recovery and loyalty to brands, as they are motivated by habitual purchasing or monetary benefits (Gorlier & Michel, 2020 ). This calls for providers to adapt their recovery approaches, particularly on compensation and customer support, by enhancing their focus on customer orientation support services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While extant research shows the importance of norm salience in the consumerbrand relationship (Aggarwal, 2009), the current research suggests that using anthropomorphization (vs not using this strategy) might be a way to change the relative salience of the exchange and communal norms in this relationship. This is instrumental in understanding the nature of consumer-brand relationships, which is a growing area within the marketing discipline (Gorlier and Michel, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, two types of motivation that impact customers' involvement in brand engagement can be identified: functional and symbolic motivation. Researchers have typically argued that functional motivation emerges from the behavioral type of loyalty toward brands, which is commonly based on the actual purchasing behavior of customers (Dick & Basu, 1994; Eggert et al, 2019; Gorlier & Michel, 2020; Jacoby & Kyner, 1973; Ozuem et al, 2016). In contrast, a brand that is central to a customer's value system and has symbolic significance to them causes them to remain with the brand (Aaker, 1997; Giakoumaki & Krepapa, 2020; Heitmann et al, 2020; Jacob et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have investigated the sole influence of brand symbolism on motivating customers to integrate the brand as part of their social identity and reinforce their view of self (Swaminathan et al, 2020), ultimately leading to customers engaging with the brand or other consumers through social media (Giakoumaki & Krepapa, 2020). There is a consistent body of evidence, however, suggesting that information completeness and a need for bridging social capital are predictors of customer satisfaction and relationship commitment to brand communities (Cheng et al, 2018; Gorlier & Michel, 2020). Building on these findings, Cheng et al (2018) argued that people build relationships with OBCs because of their need to acquire connections with new people.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%