How Silencing of Dissent in Science Impacts Woman. The Gardasil® Story

Abstract

The issues of safety and efficacy of certain vaccines remains extremely contentious. The venues for this debate have included periodicals, documentary films, and an ever-increasing number of on-line sites. While debate in science is not only a common occurrence but a fundamental tenet of the scientific community, it only works when divergent opinions can be heard. When those who hold an opposing opinion are denigrated and/or marginalized by those holding the majority opinion such as in the issue of vaccination, where cultural authority for the issue is owned by the profession of medicine, both science and the public lose. What is often forgotten are the benefits derived from the questioning of drug safety that not only extends to the public but to physicians who rely on the truthfulness and accuracy of the information that is being supplied to them by manufactures and government agencies. While most physicians believe they are functioning in their patient's best interest when making vaccine recommendations, these recommendations by in large have become a matter of rote and are made because most physicians have bought into the "vaccines are safe" mantra. What most physicians don't realize is they have unknowingly been recruited by big pharma to assist in shutting down the vaccination debate. This suppression of vaccine opposition even among academics, is becoming more commonplace and will lead down a slippery slope that will silence opposition science, and the dangers that come with this. Those who question vaccine safety have been ostracized, misquoted and even made to appear mentally ill by those who hold the majority opinion on the issue. Physicians who question vaccine safety have had their licenses threatened or have been fired from positions. Tactics such as name calling and the use of terms such as pseudo-science, (even when the evidence being presented is from widely accepted peer-reviewed journals) or "conspiracy theorists" which has the effect of placing those holding the minority opinion in the category of such groups as 9/11 truthers, are not uncommon. Other methods of How to cite this paper:

Retracted: Deceptology in cancer and vaccine sciences: Seeds of immune destruction‐mini electric shocks in mitochondria: Neuroplasticity‐electrobiology of response profiles and increased induced diseases in four generations – A hypothesis

“…Unfortunately, governmental guidelines, particularly on cancer or vaccine-related statistics, safety procedures, vaccine effectiveness or reported injuries are provided on behalf of medical establishment with little independent ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Deposition of Dr. Plotkin https://youtu.be/rGDNsqk0KR0?list = PLb- . Often official information is not worthy of serious considerations once the scientific pros and cons are weighed, particularly regarding information on root causes of cancer epidemics, over-, under-diagnosis of diseases, toxicities of drugs, biologics or vaccines safety [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]17,[20][21][22][23][50][51][52]64,69,71,93,136,137,140,141,157,164,177,192 § § § § § §,*******, † † † † † † †, ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡, § § § § § § § . Often, credible sci- gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/ § § § § § § § https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol.pdf entific information that is prepared by scientists who work in the government or academia are ignored, dismissed or abused when members of the establishment decide to publicize drugs or vaccines of their choice.…”

“…Often, credible sci- gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/ § § § § § § § https://pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol.pdf entific information that is prepared by scientists who work in the government or academia are ignored, dismissed or abused when members of the establishment decide to publicize drugs or vaccines of their choice. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][10][11][12][13]17,18,34,[36][37][38][39]64,69,71,77,94,143,149,169,172,176,178,[180][181][182][183][184][186][187][188][189][190][191][192][193][194][195][196][197] In general, diversities and extent of immune disorders [acute inflammatory res...…”

“…Professionals with financial ties to government and industry often label views of independent and competent professionals as a 'threat' to public health! [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]12,13,[15][16][17]22,34,71,142,145,167,196,[205][206][207] (unpublished observations). Often independent, highly competent, and concerned professionals who are frustrated with the diseased condition of the money-driven mentality of the medical system discuss or publish their views on different sites on Internet.…”

“…As detailed below, the presence of active or inactive specific pathogens and adjuvants in current vaccines are hypothesized as causes, aggregations‐exacerbations, and consequences of significant increased in immune disorders in young and old in the twentieth century, 1,5,8,20,40–90 (Figure 1).…”

“…As shown below, pathogen‐specific vaccines (eg, polio, swine flu, hepatitis a, b, c, MMRs, meningitis, shingles, anthrax, pertussis, HPV, SARS, Ebola, Zika, or ‘covid‐19’) and incipient weaken/destroy the complex electrobiology of immunity and Not Promote It ! 1,5,8,11,17,20,27–178 …”