2020
DOI: 10.1111/jora.12558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How School Contexts Shape the Relations Among Adolescents’ Beliefs, Peer Victimization, and Depressive Symptoms

Abstract: The present research examined how school contexts shape the extent to which beliefs about the potential for change (implicit theories) interact with social adversity to predict depressive symptoms. A preregistered multilevel regression analysis using data from 6,237 ninth‐grade adolescents in 25 U.S. high schools showed a three‐way interaction: Implicit theories moderated the associations between victimization and depressive symptoms only in schools with high levels of school‐level victimization, but not in sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important next step, however, will be to more fully assess the generalizability and heterogeneity of these effects with new large-scale trials in diverse populations and contexts 43 . These trials might reveal previously undiscovered context-, population- or individual-level moderators of the intervention’s effects that inform decisions about how best to scale the intervention; for example, by identifying environmental conditions known as 'affordances' on which the beneficial effects of the intervention depend 44 , 45 . Doing so can also contribute to theory by shedding light on the psychological mechanisms by which the intervention has its effects 43 , 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important next step, however, will be to more fully assess the generalizability and heterogeneity of these effects with new large-scale trials in diverse populations and contexts 43 . These trials might reveal previously undiscovered context-, population- or individual-level moderators of the intervention’s effects that inform decisions about how best to scale the intervention; for example, by identifying environmental conditions known as 'affordances' on which the beneficial effects of the intervention depend 44 , 45 . Doing so can also contribute to theory by shedding light on the psychological mechanisms by which the intervention has its effects 43 , 46 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, victims are more likely to blame themselves (i.e., make an internal attribution) as they are the only one or one of the few who have this problem. They may also conclude that nothing can be done about it (uncontrollable), because the many defending efforts in the classrooms did not to stop the perpetrators (Kaufman et al 2020). Victims who make internal and uncontrollable attributions have more psychosocial problems than victims who do not make these attributions (Schacter et al 2015).…”
Section: Defending Descriptive Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as mentioned previously, peer victimization experiences enable adolescents to develop negative self-images through their reflective self-evaluation (Yue et al, 2020) and self-blame attributions (Lopez & Dubois, 2005). Social comparisons may also operate in these processes (adolescents likely compare themselves to peers who are not victimized; Kaufman et al, 2020). Moreover, peer victimization often threatens adolescent peer status in the group, which also increases victims’ negative self-evaluations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%