2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.02.006
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Safe Are Universal Pluripotent Stem Cells?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hypothesize that any AF contains few 'hypoimmunogenic or universal hAFSCs' and many typical cells that are not hypoimmunogenic or universal hAFSCs and that hypoimmunogenic or universal hAF- Several researchers have considered developing universal or hypoimmunogenic hPSCs that do not express HLA Class Ia and Class II. [18][19][20][21][23][24][25][26][27][40][41][42][43][44] However, all of these methods except the method presented in our present study require knocking out, knocking in or editing specific genes, which indicate the need for genetic modification (editing) of the cells, which restrict the clinical use of the hPSCs. For example, several researchers reported knocking out or gene editing HLA-A, -B and/or -C genes to generate homozygous hPSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We hypothesize that any AF contains few 'hypoimmunogenic or universal hAFSCs' and many typical cells that are not hypoimmunogenic or universal hAFSCs and that hypoimmunogenic or universal hAF- Several researchers have considered developing universal or hypoimmunogenic hPSCs that do not express HLA Class Ia and Class II. [18][19][20][21][23][24][25][26][27][40][41][42][43][44] However, all of these methods except the method presented in our present study require knocking out, knocking in or editing specific genes, which indicate the need for genetic modification (editing) of the cells, which restrict the clinical use of the hPSCs. For example, several researchers reported knocking out or gene editing HLA-A, -B and/or -C genes to generate homozygous hPSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…65 However, this technology is nascent and has potential drawbacks, such as the unintended generation of transmissible cancers. 66…”
Section: Identif Ying Novel Mechanis Ms Of H Uman S K In Pl a S Ti mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups are working on gene‐editing strategies to make iPSCs invisible to the immune system; thus, creating universal donor cells that will avoid rejection 65 . However, this technology is nascent and has potential drawbacks, such as the unintended generation of transmissible cancers 66 …”
Section: Identifying Novel Mechanisms Of Human Skin Plasticity and Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the generation of functional IPCs would be successful with the abovementioned cell types, allogeneic betalike cells could trigger the immune system of T1D patients resulting in graft rejection [15]. One strategy to make the IPCs invisible to the host immune system could be to generate universal stem cells by manipulating the genes that encode for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and class II proteins [30,31]. Genetic modification approaches including the use of CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology have also been used to eliminate the HLA gene expressions in iPSCs before differentiation into IPCs [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%