2014
DOI: 10.1080/13632752.2014.891358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Russian teachers, mothers and school psychologists perceive internalising and externalising behaviours in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings have additionally shown that whereas severity of student learning difficulties was positively correlated with teachers’ attributions to student ability (e.g., intelligence), severity of student behavioral problems instead corresponded to more personality attributions (Medway, 1979). Other studies have similarly revealed that whereas ability and effort tend to be the most commonly cited reasons for student learning problems, personality and parental factors are more often endorsed as reasons for behavioral difficulties (e.g., Medway, 1979; Hughes et al, 1993; Savina et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Findings have additionally shown that whereas severity of student learning difficulties was positively correlated with teachers’ attributions to student ability (e.g., intelligence), severity of student behavioral problems instead corresponded to more personality attributions (Medway, 1979). Other studies have similarly revealed that whereas ability and effort tend to be the most commonly cited reasons for student learning problems, personality and parental factors are more often endorsed as reasons for behavioral difficulties (e.g., Medway, 1979; Hughes et al, 1993; Savina et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Despite these differences, findings concerning teachers’ attributional tendencies for student misbehavior are largely similar to those observed regarding attributions for low achievement. When faced with student behavioral problems (e.g., disobedience, disruption, aggression; mild, moderate, severe), teachers’ attributions tend to not implicate themselves (e.g., instructional method, curriculum, teacher attitudes, discipline) or administrative factors (e.g., teaching demands, class size) but instead consistently cite factors internal to the student (e.g., ability, effort, personality, social/physical skills) and parental variables (e.g., dysfunction, attitudes, interest; Vernberg and Medway, 1981; Christenson et al, 1983; Miller, 1995; Bibou-Nakou et al, 2000; Mavropoulou and Padeliadu, 2002; Ho, 2004; Kulinna, 2007; McAuliffe et al, 2009; Andreou and Rapti, 2010; Ding et al, 2010; Kauppi and Porhola, 2012; Savina et al, 2014). For example, whereas more than half of the teachers in Ding et al’s (2010) study attributed students’ misbehaviors to students’ lack of effort, with substantial proportions citing various other factors internal to students (e.g., laziness: 32%, study habits: 23%, low interest: 20%), only 0.8% of teachers attributed students’ behavioral difficulties to their own instructional effectiveness or classroom management skills.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Желание получить помощь от педагога-психолога может быть также опосредовано тем, как взрослые воспринимают проблемы ребенка и объясняют их причины. Так, было показано, что учителя, считающие себя в какой-то степени ответственными за проблемное поведение ребенка, склонны, скорее, рекомендовать помощь психиатра и медикаментозное лечение, нежели помощь психолога [12]. В то же время учителя, которые объясняют проблемы ребенка семейными факторами, отдают предпочтение психологу.…”
unclassified