2021
DOI: 10.1108/ijcma-04-2021-0054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Rude! Linking supervisor incivility to subordinates’ discretionary work effort

Abstract: Purpose Although past research has looked into myriad consequences of workplace incivility, little attention has been paid to the effects of supervisor incivility (SI) on employees’ sense of vitality and their discretionary work effort (DWE). Moreover, the mechanisms that drive the harmful effects of SI remain largely unknown. The current study seeks to address these gaps in the literature. In particular, this study aims to examine how SI culminates in decreased DWE. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leveraging personal and professional contacts, existing employees of the NGOs ( N = 226) were approached at time 1 (T1) and requested to participate in part one of this study’s surveys. Following Ahmed et al (2021) and Anjum et al (2021a) , two attention check questions [“Please encircle yes to indicate that you are paying attention” ( Scott-Campbell and Williams, 2020 ) and “Please encircle agree for this question” ( Kung et al, 2018 )] were included in the employees’ survey to ensure obtaining quality data. Further, respondents were requested to provide information regarding their employee code, job title, and department in the demographic profile section of the survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging personal and professional contacts, existing employees of the NGOs ( N = 226) were approached at time 1 (T1) and requested to participate in part one of this study’s surveys. Following Ahmed et al (2021) and Anjum et al (2021a) , two attention check questions [“Please encircle yes to indicate that you are paying attention” ( Scott-Campbell and Williams, 2020 ) and “Please encircle agree for this question” ( Kung et al, 2018 )] were included in the employees’ survey to ensure obtaining quality data. Further, respondents were requested to provide information regarding their employee code, job title, and department in the demographic profile section of the survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, this study builds on and lends empirical support to COR theory's relatively less scrutinized resource caravans' principle (Hobfoll, 2001), evidence, for which is rarely found in management research (e.g. Ahmed et al, 2021;Anjum et al, 2021). Finally, this study introduces a new invigorating personal resource (WC) to COR theory, thus expanding its resource base.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ahmed et al. , 2021; Anjum et al , 2021). Finally, this study introduces a new invigorating personal resource (WC) to COR theory, thus expanding its resource base.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such evidence in the Indian organizational framework could be credited to a high-power distance culture in which the employees seem to be pro-civil in accepting the disparities and treatments (Hofstede Insights, 2020). At the workplace, condescending remarks, putdowns, unpleasant or harsh behaviour and unfavourable gestures by others are termed as workplace incivility (Anjum et al , 2021). The notion of workplace incivility has been a source of concern in enterprises due to its detrimental impact on employees, employers and organizations (Aljawarneh and Atan, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%