1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001340050332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How reliable is the predictive value of SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortical responses?

Abstract: SEP allow an early reliable assessment of both poor and good prognosis in SBD, in particular when applied serially. BLCR does not always imply a fatal diagnosis, as a circumscribed contusional lesion rarely may lead to selective reversible blockage of ascending somatosensory pathways in the brainstem. In contradiction to this lesional etiology, a hypoxia-induced BLCR pattern seems to correlate strictly with a poor prognosis, reflecting a different pathogenesis with diffuse destruction of cortex and thalamocort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We found SEPs with BLCR only in patients with very poor outcome (persistent vegetative state at best). This agrees with several previous studies [3, 4, 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Amplitude configuration abnormalities and prolonged central conduction time were less predictive; the percentage of occurrence was similar in both outcome groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We found SEPs with BLCR only in patients with very poor outcome (persistent vegetative state at best). This agrees with several previous studies [3, 4, 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25]. Amplitude configuration abnormalities and prolonged central conduction time were less predictive; the percentage of occurrence was similar in both outcome groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…They have been shown to be more powerful than electroencephalograms [24, 36±39] and are superior to clinical signs and measures such as cranial nerve and motor responses [36,40,41], and the Glasgow Coma Score [18,21,42,43]. They can also be performed in clinical situations that prevent the performance of these other tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dieses ca. 3 Monate oder 6 Monate [21] nach dem Unfall ermittelten. Einen ähn-lich langen Zeitraum wählten u. a. Cant et al [6].…”
Section: Studiendesign Und Untersuchungsmethodenunclassified