How open is innovation?

Dahlander, Linus; Gann, David

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013

Cited by 2,021 publications

(1,596 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,371

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…When using the 'topic' field to search the database, ISI-WoS returns all articles with the search terms in their title, keywords, or abstracts. Scholars in management science consider this database the most comprehensive and use it frequently in systematic reviews (Albort-Morant and Ribeiro-Soriano 2016; Dahlander and Gann 2010;Mian et al 2016). However, although the ISI-WoS database is one of the most comprehensive scientific journal databases, it is not exhaustive.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review

Hausberg

Korreck²

2018

J Technol Transf

205

193

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A long and rich research tradition exists on the phenomenon of business incubators since this kind of venture support institution first emerged. One can observe an increasing heterogeneity of incubation beyond the traditional mainstream focus on regional development and university-based incubators. In the last decade, in particular the phenomenon of accelerators as a particular form of incubators received increasing research interest. A few literature reviews started summarizing the field, but left some important issues unanswered. This systematic review study contributes to this effort deriving current themes and a research agenda. We find that open innovation and social capital theory increasingly complement the resource-based view as frameworks to understand business incubation. Moreover, the phenomenon of private corporate incubators and accelerators gains traction, both in entrepreneurship theory and practice.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review

Hausberg

Korreck²

2018

J Technol Transf

205

193

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Dahlander and Gann (2010), there are two types of strategy for open innovation: pecuniary and nonpecuniary. Pecuniary strategies consist of external practices directly related to acquiring or selling companies, the first an inbound activity and the latter outbound.…”

Section: Open Innovation Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Open Innovation Journey in Emerging Economies: An Analysis of the Brazilian Aerospace Industry

Armellini

Kaminski

Beaudry

2014

J.Aerosp. Technol. Manag.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open innovation is the systematic integration of collaborative, sourcing and revealing practices into a firm's business strategy. Its implementation does not happen at once, but through a journey. This paper investigates this subject in an emergent economy context, the Brazilian aerospace industry, presenting the critical analysis of a questionnaire-based survey performed by means of personal in-company interviews in 22 firms. It comprises a wide range of practices associated with open innovation, connected to a conceptual model. We find open innovation elements in the sample, with no open business strategy behind them, though. Deficiencies regarding funding, R&D maturity and intellectual property protection prevent the cluster from being fully open innovator. Nevertheless, the culture company in the sample is very prone towards openness. From that, we conclude that open innovation in the cluster is still "unfreezing", but with great potential to emerge, once these problems are solved.

show abstract

“…According to the definition, there are three main cores of OI activities, divided with respect to the direction of knowledge inflow: from the outside-in, from the inside-out, and one combining both. Another classification of OI activities (Dahlander and Gann, 2010) groups them into four types of openness: sourcing, acquiring, revealing, selling. Armellini et al (2016) presented a useful combination of those two different classifications, as well as issues associated with each combination (of core process and type of openness), as shown in Table 2.…”

Section: Product Development Processes (Pdp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysing Open Innovation Integration to Product Development Processes Within the Brazilian Automotive Industry

Marin¹,

Kaminski²

2018

Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present study is to analyze how different Open Innovation (OI) activities occur in Product Development Processes (PDP) from the Brazilian automotive industry. From conceptual frameworks unifying both OI and PDP, the study presents the main OI practices that are applicable to the PDP, as well as four constructs regarding that interrelationship. A case study approach is taken in 7 companies with 11 interviews, and a comparative and critical analysis is made, providing insight into how OI and PDP literature relate to the actual work being done in the automotive industry.

show abstract

How open is innovation?

Cited by 2,021 publications

References 59 publications

Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review

Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review

The Open Innovation Journey in Emerging Economies: An Analysis of the Brazilian Aerospace Industry

Analysing Open Innovation Integration to Product Development Processes Within the Brazilian Automotive Industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About