2013
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318265a6ce
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Narrow is the Spectrum of Submaximal Speeds in Swimming?

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify the boundary of submaximal speed zones (i.e., exercise intensity domains) between maximal aerobic speed (S-400) and lactate threshold (LT) in swimming. A 400-m all-out test, a 7 × 200 m incremental step test, and two to four 30-minute submaximal tests were performed by 12 male endurance swimmers (age = 24.5 ± 9.6 years; body mass = 71.3 ± 9.8 kg) to determine S-400, speed corresponding to LT, and maximal lactate steady state (MLSS). S-400 was 1.30 ± 0.09 m·s (400 m-5:0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
17
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
17
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar alterations have been mentioned in female swimmers during continuous swimming [4]. These physiological alterations occurring after small speed increments probably confirm previous reports for a very narrow spectrum of submaximal speeds in swimming around the LT [34]. The slight differences between methods and the increased metabolic response even after small speed changes highlight the need of choosing the most appropriate method for sLT evaluation to avoid underestimation or overestimation of sMLSS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similar alterations have been mentioned in female swimmers during continuous swimming [4]. These physiological alterations occurring after small speed increments probably confirm previous reports for a very narrow spectrum of submaximal speeds in swimming around the LT [34]. The slight differences between methods and the increased metabolic response even after small speed changes highlight the need of choosing the most appropriate method for sLT evaluation to avoid underestimation or overestimation of sMLSS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the present study, all participants were able to comply with the imposed speed (the CS), but some of them failed to maintain it for 30 min. Thus, our findings suggest that great inter-individual differences may appear between CS and sMLSS (−6% to 4%) that may critically alter sustainability or metabolic responses despite that the range of mean speeds corresponding to various aerobic indices is very narrow in swimming [27]. Moreover, the selection of distances for CS calculation in the present study (200 and 400-m) may overestimate the “ideal” CS calculation and this should be considered as a limitation of the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, unless an incremental and maximal protocol is implemented it seems that the changes in dv are quite low. Even so, most of the time the protocols include a very narrow pace range (Greco et al., ). A second explanation for the lower sensitivity is that, according to some determinist models, dv is an intermediate variable between the energetic and biomechanical fields, depending on third‐party variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%