1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00015-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How muscle architecture and moment arms affect wrist flexion-extension moments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
105
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
105
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4B shows that torques were lower than flexor torques, as generally found in the literature. The measured highest peak was recorded at a slightly flexed position (+10°), which contrasts with findings in [16][17][18][19] where peaks were mainly located in the extension region. However, measurements in Garner and Pandy [9] were similar to those of the present work with the highest peaks occurring in flexion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4B shows that torques were lower than flexor torques, as generally found in the literature. The measured highest peak was recorded at a slightly flexed position (+10°), which contrasts with findings in [16][17][18][19] where peaks were mainly located in the extension region. However, measurements in Garner and Pandy [9] were similar to those of the present work with the highest peaks occurring in flexion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Fig. 6 also confirms findings in [18][19], even though in these works FCU was found to operate also at shorter lengths, while the range of motion of FCR in [18] was located on the plateau region of the force-length relationship. However, it must be emphasized that the results shown herein refer to FCU, FCR and FDS lumped together and the range of motion used during the experiments was smaller than the ones in the two cited works.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resultant Pleistocene sample includes the Amud 1, La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1, Feldhofer 1, La Ferrassie 1 and 2, Kebara 2, Kiik-Koba 1, Regourdou 1, Shani-tional area (PCSA) of muscle acting across the joint and the muscle's effective mechanical advantage (EMA) (Gonzalez et al 1997;Lieber and Boakes 1988;Narici et al 1992;Zajac 1992). The effective or physiological cross sectional area (pCSA) = (m/ρl) cos θ, where m is muscle mass, ρ is muscle density, l is fascicle length, and θ is pennation angle (Zajac 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%