2018
DOI: 10.1017/pan.2018.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice

Abstract: Multiplicative interaction models are widely used in social science to examine whether the relationship between an outcome and an independent variable changes with a moderating variable. Current empirical practice tends to overlook two important problems. First, these models assume a linear interaction effect that changes at a constant rate with the moderator. Second, estimates of the conditional effects of the independent variable can be misleading if there is a lack of common support of the moderator. Replic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
446
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 670 publications
(489 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
446
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative specifications yield substantively similar results. We also note that we find evidence of common support for these data using the Hainmueller, Mummolo, and Xu () diagnostics.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The alternative specifications yield substantively similar results. We also note that we find evidence of common support for these data using the Hainmueller, Mummolo, and Xu () diagnostics.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Using the diagnostic recommendations proposed by Hainmueller, Mummolo, and Xu (), we find that the results are not reliant on “extrapolation or interpolation of the functional form to an area where there is no or only sparse data” (165).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The underlying interaction model assumes that the interaction is linear and there is common support in the data to estimate across the distribution of the moderator (see Hainmueller, Mummolo, & Xu, 2019). To check that these assumptions are valid, we use the binning estimator to test these assumptions in Equations (2) and (4) (for details, see, Hainmueller et al, 2019).…”
Section: Accounting For Non-linearities In the Interaction Between mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key variable of interest is the interaction term, Massacrei×Muslimi, and its component parts, Massacrei and Muslimi. We follow the advice of Hainmueller, Mummolo, and Xu () and present marginal effects plots. Since we expect mixed communities and mixed communities with histories of violence to have fewer returnees, plots with downward trends are consistent with Hypotheses 1 and 2.…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%