How much does country matter? An analysis of firms’ growth options

Abstract

Recent international strategy research emphasizes the importance of understanding the effects of geographic location on firms’ strategies and performance outcomes. We contribute to this research by providing empirical evidence that the interplay of country and industry effects matters substantially in explaining the variation in the value of growth options of firms based in different countries. Our results show that country–industry effects are the second largest source of variation, following firm effects, while industry and country effects are relatively small when considered in their own right. That valuable growth options are tied to country and industry interactions has important implications for international strategy research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies (2008) 39, 387–405. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400355

Organisational design alternatives within international operations networks: a transaction cost perspective

“…Although culture has always been a key variable in international business and international operations management research, recent findings show that past research has overlooked the importance of the magnitude and type of cultural risk at stake when valuing a foreign investment, and that many international business models are not robust over wide ranges of values linked to culture and country effects (Li and Rugman, 2007;Tong et al, 2008a;Tong et al, 2008b). It is due to the nature of this new research stream, i.e.…”

A Fresh Look at Decision Making in International Investment Choices: Firm International Coherence and Home-Host Country Relatedness

“…After some earlier attempts to account for the dispersion of multinational activities across dissimilar geographic regions (Buhner, 1987;Grant, 1987;Kim, Hwang, & Burgers, 1989), research moved beyond a comparison of domestic firms to MNEs, researchers emphasized the multidimensional nature of the multinationality construct (Tallman & Li, 1996;Thomas & Eden, 2004;Sullivan, 1994) with researchers exploring the impact of international scope, degree, and institutional diversity, on MNE performance and a number of parallels drawn to product diversification theories (e.g., Contractor et al, 2003;Goerzen & Beamish, 2003;Makino, Isobe, & Chan, 2004;Tallman & Li, 1996;Thomas & Eden, 2004;Tong, Alessandri, Reuer, & Chintakananda, 2008). A distinction was established between degree and scope of international diversification, defined as the geographic range or breadth of the firm's foreign presence (Goerzen & Beamish, 2003;Tallman and Li, 1996;Wiersema & Bowen, 2008).…”

Environmental Performance of Multinationals: A Comparative Study Based On Climate Change Strategy

“…Tong et al (2008) observed that country-industry interaction has value in the growth options of firms based in different countries. Earlier research suggested that good environmental performers had a positive association with profitability (King and Lenox, 2002).…”

“…The potential market growth provided by countries differs because of the differences in inherent country-level properties and these differences between countries do not diminish substantially even with the phenomenon of globalization (Tong et al, 2008). These country effects are important for firm performance (Makino et al, 2004).…”