2014 Science and Information Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/sai.2014.6918171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How many participants are really enough for usability studies?

Abstract: The growth of the Internet and related technologies has enabled the development of a new breed of dynamic websites, applications and software products that are growing rapidly in use and that have had a great impact on many businesses. These technologies need to be continuously evaluated by usability evaluation methods (UEMs) to measure their efficiency and effectiveness, to assess user satisfaction, and ultimately to improve their quality. However, estimating the sample sizes for these methods has become the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
51
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Hwang and Salvendy [2010] conducted a meta-analysis by analysing many published research papers since 1990 and suggest that at least 10±2 users are required to discover 80% of usability problems. Furthermore, Alroobaea and Mayhew [2014] recommend to consider 20 users as a maximum number of users and 12 users as a minimum number of users for usability studies along with the complexity of the study and the criticality of its context.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, Hwang and Salvendy [2010] conducted a meta-analysis by analysing many published research papers since 1990 and suggest that at least 10±2 users are required to discover 80% of usability problems. Furthermore, Alroobaea and Mayhew [2014] recommend to consider 20 users as a maximum number of users and 12 users as a minimum number of users for usability studies along with the complexity of the study and the criticality of its context.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific numbers, ranging from five users to 20 users (See Section 2), have already been suggested despite the fact that more users are typically used for statistical analysis (such as Jerger et al [2014]). There is also a considerable number of views which argue against these suggested numbers [Bevan et al 2003;Alroobaea and Mayhew 2014;Schmettow 2012]. They assert that each study has its own characteristics, and therefore the number of users should not be the same for all usability studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(http://www.welcomecottages.com/#ukcot) [15] asserts that 10 to 12 participants is probably a good baseline range for UT. Also, [16] pointed out that 8 users are more appropriate for commercial studies and to find enough major and more minor problems. For the purpose of our study, 10 web users were recruited carefully to reflect the real users of the targeted website.…”
Section: B Test Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, [16] pointed out that 8 users are more appropriate for commercial studies and to find enough major and more minor problems. For the purpose of our study, 10 web users were recruited carefully to reflect the real users of the targeted website.…”
Section: B Test Obj Ect Smentioning
confidence: 99%