How manufacturer brand erosion shapes consumer assortment perceptions

Abstract

Purpose Recently, the popularity of store brands has resulted in some manufacturer brands being removed from shelves. The current literature lacks empirical work on the effect of manufacturer brand erosion on consumer assortment perception and repatronage intention. Based on signalling theory, the purpose of this paper is to manufacturer brands play a signalling role and contend that manufacturer brand erosion has detrimental effects on the assortment perception due to reduced signalling efficacy. Design/methodology/approach A 3 (low manufacturer brand erosion vs high manufacturer brand erosion vs manufacturer brand dominance) ×2 (assortment size: small vs large) between-subject experiment was conducted. Findings Manufacturer brand erosion exerts a negative effect on assortment attractiveness and consumers’ repatronage intention; the greater the erosion, the larger the negative effect. These negative effects are mediated by reduced consumer perceptions of assortment quality and variety. A large (vs small) assortment size attenuates the negative effect of manufacturer brand erosion by improving perceived assortment quality. Practical implications To engage in strategic positioning through efficient assortment management, retailers should cooperate with brand manufacturers, instead of promoting their own private labels. Nevertheless, a large assortment dominated by store brands signals that the retailer has built a strong private brand, which in turn gains a differentiation advantage. Originality/value This paper is among the first to take the signalling perspective and explicitly investigate whether and how manufacturer brand erosion exerts a significant impact on assortment perception.

Surviving and thriving through a crisis: a resiliency branding approach to transform airline industry

“…The study of Li et al . (2020) defines that the reputation of the brand and clarity of communication serves as signals that escalate customers' expectations, positively influence their purchase decisions and vice versa.…”

“…The study of Li et al (2020) defines that the reputation of the brand and clarity of communication serves as signals that escalate customers' expectations, positively influence their purchase decisions and vice versa. However, ambiguous signals would have lower effects on the behavioral motivation of customers (Helm and Mark, 2007).…”

Retain or Reduce? Delisting Decisions in Relation to Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships in Grocery Store Retailing

“…An inefficient manufacturer-retailer relationship can lead to item delisting. From the retailer's point of view, a poor relationship between the manufacturer and the retailer may be rooted in the reputation (Li et al, 2020) and unreliability of the manufacturer (Dhahri et al, 2022), which can create conflicts and lead to the delisting of items (Sloot and Verhoef, 2008;Van der Maelen et al, 2017). The retailer's bargaining power may be reflected in delisting threats; in such cases, the retailer aims to improve contracting conditions and may impose slotting allowances (Bunte et al, 2011).…”

Developing responsible consumption behaviours through social media platforms: sustainable brand practices as message cues

“…In addition to the detailed cognitive probing, consumers also rely on cues that demand a relatively minor portion of their cognition. This heuristic information (Li et al , 2019) processing of the messages generally occurs from non-content related components of the message. One important heuristic cue mentioned in the social network literature is “message popularity” (Chang et al , 2015).…”