How long do nursing staff take to measure and record patients’ vital signs observations in hospital? A time-and-motion study

Abstract

Introduction Monitoring vital signs in hospital is an important part of safe patient care. However, there are no robust estimates of the workload it generates for nursing staff. This makes it difficult to plan adequate staffing to ensure current monitoring protocols can be delivered. Objective To estimate the time taken to measure and record one set of patient's vital signs; and to identify factors associated with the time required to measure and record one set of patient's vital signs. Methods We undertook a time-and-motion study of 16 acute medical or surgical wards across four hospitals in England. Two trained observers followed a standard operating procedure to record the time taken to measure and record vital signs. We used mixed-effects models to estimate the mean time using whole vital signs rounds, which included equipment preparation, time spent taking vital signs at the bedside, vital signs documentation, and equipment storing. We tested whether our estimates were influenced by nurse, ward and hospital factors. Results After excluding non-vital signs related interruptions, dividing the length of a vital signs round by the number of vital signs assessments in that round yielded an estimated time per vital signs set of 5 min and 1 second (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 4:39–5:24). If interruptions within the round were included, the estimated time was 6:26 (95% CI = 6:01–6:50). If only time taking each patient's vital signs at the bedside was considered, after excluding non-vital signs related interruptions, the estimated time was 3:45 (95% CI = 3:32–3:58). We found no substantial differences by hospital, ward or nurse characteristics, despite different systems for recording vital signs being used across the hospitals. Discussion The time taken to observe and record a patient's vital signs is considerable, so changes to recommended assessment frequency could have major workload implications. Variation in estimates derived from previous studies may, in part, arise from a lack of clarity about what was included in the reported times. We found no evidence that nurses save time when using electronic vital signs recording, or that the grade of staff measuring the vital signs influenced the time taken. Conclusions Measuring and recording vital signs is time consuming and the impact of interruptions and preparation away from the bedside is considerable. When considering the nursing workload around vital signs assessment, no assumption of relative efficiency should be made if different technologies or staff groups are deployed.

The Purpose of Time-Motion Studies (TMSs) in Healthcare: A Literature Review

“…It also improves workers' working conditions and the environment by preventing unnecessary manpower movement [ 1 ]. There is a strong need to discuss and apply time-motion studies (TMSs) to improve the working efficiency in healthcare [ 2 ]. By considering this need an attempt is made to collect the available data on TMSs by searching different research papers through different sources.…”

The prediction of early mortality by the ROX index of oxygenation and respiratory rate in diverse Canadian and Ugandan cohorts of unselected patient: a post-hoc retrospective analysis of 80,558 patient observations

“…18 A ROX <=10 predicted 28day mortality in patients with sepsis, 3 and Prower et al found that a ROX value of 14.91 identified deterioration four hours earlier than NEWS2. 4 Unlike early warning scores, which require a complete set of vital signs that take time to measure and calculate, 19 the ROX index only requires an oximeter and can be quickly and repeatedly determined. Therefore, ROX may be particularly valuable in low-resource settings and for frequently monitoring post-operative patients; levels falling below 22 causing increasing concern.…”

Effect of implementing the NEWS2 escalation protocol in a large acute NHS trust: a retrospective cohort analysis of mortality, workload and ability of early warning score to predict death within 24 hours

“…Over the 4 years of the study, total observations recorded increased by 14% from 1 976 872 to 2 249 118 as shown in table 3 below, with median observations per patient per day rising from 3 to 4 (online supplemental figure 2). If time taken to record observations is assumed to be 3 min 45 s, 7 this equates to an increase of 85 000 minutes a month. Sixty-five per cent of observations were attributable to patients under medical specialties, 34% to patients under surgical specialties and 1% to patients discharged by the emergency department.…”