2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How large is the local fiscal multiplier? Evidence from Chinese counties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our findings, Jeong, Kang, and Kim () and Wang and Wen () show China’s fiscal multiplier is greater than unity, based on structural VAR models using recursive identification strategy. Guo, Liu, and Ma () find a smaller fiscal multiplier (around 0.6) using annual data from China’s prefectures, while Shi and Fukushige () show fiscal multipliers of autonomous prefectures in China ranging from 0.61 to 4.93. Our estimated fiscal multiplier is within the range documented in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to our findings, Jeong, Kang, and Kim () and Wang and Wen () show China’s fiscal multiplier is greater than unity, based on structural VAR models using recursive identification strategy. Guo, Liu, and Ma () find a smaller fiscal multiplier (around 0.6) using annual data from China’s prefectures, while Shi and Fukushige () show fiscal multipliers of autonomous prefectures in China ranging from 0.61 to 4.93. Our estimated fiscal multiplier is within the range documented in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, following the suggestions by Cameron and Miller (2015), we also use the wild cluster bootstrap to test the statistical significance of regression coefficients. 19 Based on the bootstrap, we can reject the null hypothesis that γ P + γ S = 0 with a p-value of 0.010 and the null hypothesis that γ P = 0 with a p-value of 0.040.…”
Section: First-stage Regressionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, the Bureau of Economic Analysis does not publish data on net exports and business investment at the state level. In the literature on the LFM in the U.S., data for state-level government spending are often taken from the U.S. Census Bureau.3 Our approach is similar to Kraay (2012) andGuo et al (2016), who use variations in the funds loaned or transferred from an organization other than the local government for identification. Kraay (2012) estimates the fiscal multiplier in developing countries with the instrument of World Bank lending Guo et al (2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, Dillon et al (2011) employed an instrumental variable approach to estimate the impact of public investments on land values, household consumption and agricultural income in Nepal. A recent study by Guo et al (2016) measured the effect of local public spending on in-county investment and consumption across 1,800 counties in China. Focusing on government subsidies and investments in the agriculture sector, assessed the impact of government spending on agricultural growth and poverty reduction in rural India.…”
Section: Aida Investment and Policy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%