2017
DOI: 10.1353/rhe.2017.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Important are High Response Rates for College Surveys?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
152
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
8
152
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The response rate of the Finnish group was relatively low (17%), which could cause nonresponse bias. However, earlier research has shown that in studies where the sampling frames are large, reliable information can be obtained even with a response rate of 5% (Fosnacht et al, 2017). Therefore the Finnish response rate can be taken as adequate for this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response rate of the Finnish group was relatively low (17%), which could cause nonresponse bias. However, earlier research has shown that in studies where the sampling frames are large, reliable information can be obtained even with a response rate of 5% (Fosnacht et al, 2017). Therefore the Finnish response rate can be taken as adequate for this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively low response rate (17%) of Finnish students is probably due to a global trend of rising survey nonresponse rates (Massey & Tourangeau, 2013), and is another potential source of bias in this study. However, the results of Fosnacht, Sarraf, Howe, and Peck (2017) suggest that when at least 1000 students from each institution are invited to participate in a study, even a response rate of 5% should provide reliable information. Therefore, the Finnish response rate (17% with 17 922 students sampled at nine universities) can be regarded as adequate for further analyses.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response rate is consistent with the national trend in declining survey response rates (National Research Council, 2013). Furthermore, a National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) study (Fosnacht, Sarraf, Howe, & Peck, 2017) concluded that even relatively low response rates provided reliable institutionallevel estimates. Also, in other studies the total number of respondents has been shown to be more important in assuring reliable estimates than response rates (Fosnacht et al, 2017;Pike, 2012).…”
Section: Data and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even relatively low response rates have been found to produce reliable estimates, and total numbers of respondents are considered to be more important than the response rates. For instance, as few as 25 to 75 respondents (Fosnacht, Sarraf, Howe, & Peck, 2017) or 50 respondents (Pike, 2012) can provide reliable unbiased results. Except for one institution (n=71), the rest of institutions in our sample had between 160 and 935 respondents, with a total of 1,533 respondents.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%