Stochastic Processes and Related Topics 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2030-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Heavy are the Tails of a Stationary HARCH(k) Process? A Study of the Moments

Abstract: Probabilistic properties of HARCH(k) processes, as special stochastic volatility models, are investigated. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of a stationary version of a HARCH(k) process with finite (2£ )th moments, Our approach is based on the general Markov chain techniques of (Meyn and Tweedie, 1990). The conditions are explicit in the case of second moments, and also in the case of 4th moments of the HARCH(2) process.We also deduce explicit necessary and explicit sufficient condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[See also Goldie (1991), Vervaat (1979) and Embrechts, K üppelberg and Mikosch (1997).] This result is probably true in much greater generality [some evidence is in Embrechts, Samorodnitsky, Dacorogna and Muller (1996)] and provides a class of models where input variables are light tailed but output process marginals are heavy tailed. This is in contrast with the usual ARMA model assumptions where innovations are heavy tailed and hence process marginals are heavy tailed.…”
Section: Atandt Labs-research and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[See also Goldie (1991), Vervaat (1979) and Embrechts, K üppelberg and Mikosch (1997).] This result is probably true in much greater generality [some evidence is in Embrechts, Samorodnitsky, Dacorogna and Muller (1996)] and provides a class of models where input variables are light tailed but output process marginals are heavy tailed. This is in contrast with the usual ARMA model assumptions where innovations are heavy tailed and hence process marginals are heavy tailed.…”
Section: Atandt Labs-research and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We cannot, however, reject other explanations for this power law (e.g. Embrechts et al 1998;Podobnik et al 2000; see Appendix) because 25 data points is a small sample for investigating behaviour at the tails of a distribution. The lognormal distribution can be justified theoretically because population growth is a multiplicative process (Dennis & Patil 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Participants were given high‐frequency data and discussed them openly. This inspired my work on heterogeneous auto‐regressive conditional heteroscedastic processes with Gena, Michel Dacorogna and Ulrich Müller (Embrechts et al , 1998); Rudolf Grübel and I later proved that these processes are heavy‐tailed (Embrechts & Grübel, 1999).…”
Section: Quantitative Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…
Paul Embrechts (left), Thomas Mikosch (center) and Claudia Klüppelberg (right) working on their book at the Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach, in Germany. Swan! 3 Over the years, I wrote several other papers with Gena, in particular when he visited me later on sabbatical (Embrechts & Samorodnitsky, 1995; Embrechts et al , 1998; Embrechts & Samorodnitsky, 2003; Embrechts et al , 2004).…”
Section: The Birth Of Risklabmentioning
confidence: 99%