How Health Insurance Inhibits Trade In Health Care

Abstract

A range of health care services are tradable, in that consumers can travel abroad for treatment. In this paper we first estimate the gains from trade. An international price comparison of fifteen procedures reveals that there could be savings of around $1.4 billion annually even if only one in ten U.S. patients choose to undergo treatment abroad. We then identify a key impediment to realizing these gains: the nature of existing health insurance plans, which discriminate explicitly or implicitly against treatment abroad. We propose that coverage should be neutral to provider location and that reimbursement should include travel costs. [Health Affairs 25, no. 2 (2006):

International trade of health services: Global trends and local impact

“…Exploiting the gains from international trade is an option for saving on resources. The potential gains are high and several prospective studies have already been launched by governments and international organizations [48][49][50]. Current reforms in Europe aims at creating more competitive health systems and they include decreasing reimbursement rates for the patients.…”

The movement of patients across borders: challenges and opportunities for public health

“…Governments could collect taxes from medical travel and use them to improve the access and quality of health care available to the local population in developing countries. 12 However, for this to happen, it is essential that appropriate macroeconomic redistributive policies are in place or are being developed. 13 The downside might be that, with the influx of foreign patients, demand and prices for health care might rise, at least in the short run.…”

Global Skill Partnerships: a proposal for technical training in a mobile world

“…Governments can also foster international trade in health services. They can make it easier for people to purchase health services in countries where costs are lower, known as "medical tourism" (Mattoo and Subramanian 2013), such as by reducing policy constraints on the portability of health insurance (Mattoo and Rathindran 2006).…”