How far has the state ‘stepped back’: an exploratory study of the changing governance of higher education in China (1978–2018)

Abstract

Due to the politicisation of universities-within-the-state, the state's governance of higher education in China differentiates itself from other countries. This study examines how the Chinese central government adjusts its governance over universities between 1978 and 2018. Based on an extensive analysis of policy documents and scholarly research, this study proposes an analytic framework, comprising the state's governance logics, governance instruments, and institutional demonstrations. The three strategically selected governance instruments, i.e. laws, policies, and finance, are demonstrated through various aspects integral to China's higher education-the dual-goverance structure, appointment of the principal leadership, access to higher education, university and discipline structures, curriculum and ideology, funding and grants, and tuition fees. Based on an in-depth investigation, the study argues that the underlying governance logics of the state are moving from direct controls to indirect supervision; however, despite the increasing university autonomy and academic freedom in some areas, the state has never abdicated the essential power and authority over higher education institutions. This paper contributes to the theoretical and practical understanding of China's governance of higher education in recent decades.

SEM Model Analysis on the Effect of Antecedents of the University of Nairobi and Jiangsu University’s Academic Quality within the Higher Education Institutions

“…Evaluating and surveying HEIs' quality and reputation are highly useful as well to know their opinions concerning the weighting to assign to indicators for international comparative evaluations. Similar studies with this finding include (Astin & Solmon, 2012;Fayolle & Redford, 2014;Han & Xu, 2019;Jöns & Hoyler, 2013;Khamala, Makori, & Njiraine, 2018;Mukhwana et al, 2016;Muñoz-Suárez et al, 2020).…”

China’s Internationalized Higher Education During Covid-19: Collective Student Autoethnography

“…Grown from a long tradition of totalitarian instrumentalism, China's state government remains an essential authority in educational systems. At the same time, it relinquishes from direct supervision of IHE, providing universities and the private sector with high levels of autonomy within set boundaries (Han and Xu 2019;Yang et al 2007;Zha 2012). These various stakeholders are still far from striking a balance, yet due to its size and influence, China's IHE is a global player worthy of attention.…”

‘All things are in flux’: China in global science

“…This paper does not provide an account of the governance of science and universities in China (Han & Xu, 2019 ; Li & Yang, 2014 ) or explore them in terms of national culture (Marginson & Yang, 2020 ; Yang, 2020 ), large and important topics in themselves. Rather, the focus has been China’s science within global science, and the relation between the global system and national system development.…”